Cited by 320Anatomy and Medical TechnologyVirtual Reality Applications and ImpactsAugmented Reality Applications

Direct manipulation is better than passive viewing for learning anatomy in a three-dimensional virtual reality environment

Jang, Susan, Vitale, Jonathan M., Jyung, Robert W., Black, John B.·2017·Computers & Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.009

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jang, S., Vitale, J. M., Jyung, R. W., & Black, J. B.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Rutgers New Jersey Medical School (US)
Corresponding author
Vitale, Jonathan M.
Venue
Computers & Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-03
Volume
106
Pages
150-165
ISSN
0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2566164720
Cited by
320
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 11
FWCI
11.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Anatomy and Medical Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Augmented Reality Applications
Keywords
direct manipulation, passive viewing, anatomy learning, virtual reality, haptic input, medical students, inner ear, spatial ability, embodiment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review