Cited by 29Atomic and Molecular PhysicsParticle accelerators and beam dynamicsAstronomical and nuclear sciences

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 9 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Determination of the g-Factor of Single Hydrogen-Like Ions by Mode Coupling in a Penning Trap

Open access
Verd?, J.L., Djekic, S., Stahl, S., Valenzuela, T., Vogel, M., Werth, G., Kluge, H.-J., Quint, W.·2004·Physica Scripta

Abstract

A method has been developed and applied for the determination of the electronic g -factor of single hydrogen-like ions stored in a Penning trap. The method is based on mode coupling of the ion trapping motions and is conceptionally advantageous as compared to previously used methods. It has been applied to hydrogen-like oxygen 16 O 7+ and yields a value for the g J -factor which is in agreement with previously determined values. Experimental requirements and possibilities of the new method are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1238/physica.topical.112a00068

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 9 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingnone given

    The new method is based on coupling the cyclotron mode to the axial mode by an electric rf field of quadrupolar geometry.

    “It is based on coupling the cyclotron mode to the axial mode by an electric rf field of quadrupolar geometry.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingreasoning

    For 16O7+, the g-factor determined by the new method is 2.0000470208(24)(44).

    “By use of Eq. ( 4) and of the electron mass m e ¼ 0:000 548 579 911 0ð12Þu from the present CODATA compilation of fundamental constants [19], the resulting value for 16 O 7þ has been determined to g ¼ 2:000 047 020 8 ð24Þð44Þ.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [19] 19. Mohr, P. J. and Taylor, B. N., Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 351 (2000).

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • The authors state this as an assumption: The motional energies of the ion are distributed according to Boltzmann factors at an effective temperature.
  • Findingnone given

    The method is based on mode coupling of the ion trapping motions.

    “The method is based on mode coupling of the ion trapping motions and is conceptionally advantageous as compared to previously used methods.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    With the new method employed in the present experimental setup, the measuring time necessary to obtain a g-factor result with the same precision is roughly 5 times less than in the previous method.

    “With the new method employed to the present experimental setup the measuring time necessary to obtain a result on the g-factor with the same precision is roughly 5 times less than in the previous method.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    A method for determining the electronic g-factor of single hydrogen-like ions stored in a Penning trap has been developed and applied.

    “A method has been developed and applied for the determination of the electronic g-factor of single hydrogen-like ions stored in a Penning trap.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 9
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 4
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    The new method requires a significantly smaller excitation of ion motions; an excitation to a cyclotron energy of around 50 meV is sufficient, two orders of magnitude less than in the previously used method.

    “We have developed a new method which requires a significantly smaller excitation of ion motions.It has been found that an excitation to a cyclotron energy of around 50 meV is sufficient, i.e. two orders of magnitude less than in the previously used method.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    The resonance is sharpened with decreasing axial energy, thus decreasing the uncertainties in the determination of the resonance maximum.

    “first, the resonance is sharpened with decreasing axial energy, thus decreasing the uncertainties in the determination of the resonance maximum.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisereasoning

    Because of magnetic field inhomogeneity, the spin-flip resonance is asymmetrically broadened and shifted, and a correction based on theoretical assumptions is needed.

    “Because of the magnetic field inhomogeneity, the resonance of the spin-flip probability as a function of the frequency ratio is asymmetrically broadened and shifted, and a correction is needed based on theoretical assumptions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.

    Interpretationnone given

    The new method features conceptual advantages compared to previous measurements.

    “This method features conceptual advantages as compared to previous measurements.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    For 16O7+, the previously determined g-factor is 2.0000470251(15)(44).

    “For 16 O 7þ the resulting value is g ¼ 2:000 047 025 1 ð15Þð44Þ [12].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [12] 12. Verdu´, J. et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 093002 (2004)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisereasoning

    Because of residual magnetic field inhomogeneity, the observed frequencies depend on the energy of the stored ion, so measurements at several cyclotron energies are needed and the frequency ratio is extrapolated to zero cyclotron energy.

    “Because of the residual inhomogeneity of the magnetic field at the position of the ion, where !L and !C are measured, the observed frequencies depend on the energy of the stored ion.Therefore, measurements at several cyclotron energies need to be performed and the frequency ratio is then extrapolated to zero cyclotron energy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    The method has been applied to hydrogen-like oxygen 16O7+ and yields a gJ-factor in agreement with previously determined values.

    “It has been applied to hydrogen-like oxygen 16 O 7þ and yields a value for the g J -factor which is in agreement with previously determined values.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    The coupling behavior is analogous to the avoided crossing of a near-resonantly driven quantum-mechanical two-level system, which has been observed with the present experimental setup before.

    “This behavior is in analogy to the avoided crossing of a near-resonantly driven quantum-mechanical two-level system [13] which has been observed with the present experimental setup before [8].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [13] 13. Cornell, E. A., Weisskoff, R. M., Boyce, K. R. and Pritchard, D. E., Phys. Rev. A 41, 312 (1990).

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [8] 8. Ha¨ffner, H. et al., Eur. Phys. J. D 22, 163 (2003).

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given

    The new method does not require extrapolation of the measured value to zero cyclotron energy; instead, only small corrections are applied.

    “Most importantly, an extrapolation of the measured value to zero cyclotron energy is not necessary.Instead, only small corrections are applied.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The individual uncertainties obey binomial statistics.

    “The individual uncertainties obey binomial statistics.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given

    The dependence of the measured g-factor on the motional energy of the ion is a priori unknown, giving rise to systematic uncertainties.

    “The dependence of the measured g-factor on the motional energy of the ion is a priori unknown, thus giving rise to systematic uncertainties.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Study design and conductown data

    The first uncertainty in the g-factor value is the combined statistical and systematical error; the second results from the uncertainty of the real electron mass.

    “The first uncertainty is the combined statistical and systematical error.The second results from the uncertainty of the real electron mass.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
12 of 12
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The motional energies of the ion are distributed according to Boltzmann factors at an effective temperature.

    “ðE þ Þ and ðE z Þ are Boltzmann factors that compare the respective energies to the ion's effective temperature in the corresponding motion.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Magnetic field drifts on the time scale of a single spin-flip measurement of several minutes are likely to occur.

    “Since drifts of the magnetic field on the time scale of a single spin-flip measurement of several minutes are likely to occur”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The cyclotron and magnetron frequencies can be accurately obtained through the axial detection signal, by means of the mode-coupling technique.

    “The cyclotron and magnetron frequencies can be accurately obtained through the axial detection signal, by means of the mode-coupling technique [24].”

    From Single Microwave Photon Detection with a Trapped Electron (2016) · cites this paper as [24]

    Section 2.2 describes detecting a split axial resonance during mode coupling, and Section 3 calculates the modified cyclotron frequency from the measured axial frequencies and the applied coupling frequency. Section 3 says the magnetron frequency is measured separately in both traps; it does not establish that the magnetron frequency is obtained through the axial detection signal by mode coupling. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. [1]1. Persson, H. et al., Phys. Rev. A 56, R2499 (1997).
  2. [2]2. Beier, T. et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 15, 41 (2002).
  3. [3]3. Beier, T. et al., Phys. Rev. Lett 88, 011603 (2002).
  4. [4]4. Shabaev, V. M. and Yerokhin, V. A., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 091801 (2002).
  5. [5]5. Brown, L. S. and Gabrielse, G., Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 233 (1986).
  6. [6]6. Hermanspahn, N. et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 427 (2000).
  7. [7]7. Ha¨ffner, H. et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5308 (2000).
  8. [8]8. Ha¨ffner, H. et al., Eur. Phys. J. D 22, 163 (2003).
  9. [9]9. Werth, G., Ha¨ffner, H. and Quint, W., Adv. At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 48, 191 (2002).
  10. [10]10. Verdu´, J. et al., Can. J. Phys. 80, 1233 (2002).
  11. [11]11. Verdu´, J. et al., J. Phys. B 36, 655 (2003).
  12. [12]12. Verdu´, J. et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 093002 (2004)
  13. [13]13. Cornell, E. A., Weisskoff, R. M., Boyce, K. R. and Pritchard, D. E., Phys. Rev. A 41, 312 (1990).
  14. [14]14. Kretzschmar, M., Eur. J. Phys. 12, 240 (1991).
  15. [15]15. Kretzschmar, M., Physica Scripta 46, 544 (1992).
  16. [17]17. Cohen-Tannoudji, C., Diu, B. and Laloe, F., ''Quantum Mechanics,'' (Wiley, New York 1977).
  17. [19]19. Mohr, P. J. and Taylor, B. N., Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 351 (2000).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Verd?, J. L., Djekic, S., Stahl, S., Valenzuela, T., Vogel, M., Werth, G., Kluge, H.-J., & Quint, W.
Affiliations
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Venue
Physica Scripta
Published
2004
Volume
T112
Issue
1
Pages
68
ISSN
0031-8949 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1976040202
Cited by
29
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Physica Scripta (publishedVersion)
Funders
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (HPRI-CT-2001-50036)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Atomic and Molecular Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle accelerators and beam dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Astronomical and nuclear sciences
Keywords
general intelligence, hydrogen-like ions, Penning trap, mode coupling, hyperfine structure, electron spin precession

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review