The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Composition and dynamics of the Caenorhabditis elegans early embryonic transcriptome
Abstract
Temporal profiles of transcript abundance during embryonic development were obtained by whole-genome expression analysis from precisely staged C. elegans embryos. The result is a highly resolved time course that commences with the zygote and extends into mid-gastrulation, spanning the transition from maternal to embryonic control of development and including the presumptive specification of most major cell fates. Transcripts for nearly half (8890) of the predicted open reading frames are detected and expression levels for the majority of them (>70%) change over time. The transcriptome is stable up to the four-cell stage where it begins rapidly changing until the rate of change plateaus before gastrulation. At gastrulation temporal patterns of maternal degradation and embryonic expression intersect indicating a mid-blastula transition from maternal to embryonic control of development. In addition, we find that embryonic genes tend to be expressed transiently on a time scale consistent with developmental decisions being made with each cell cycle. Furthermore, overall rates of synthesis and degradation are matched such that the transcriptome maintains a steady-state frequency distribution. Finally, a versatile analytical platform based on cluster analysis and developmental classification of genes is provided.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans
Fire, A., Xu, S., Montgomery, M. K., Kostas, S. A., Driver, S. E., & Mello, C. C. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35888 · Cited by 15,429
The embryonic cell lineage of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans
Sulston, J. E., Schierenberg, E., White, J. G., & Thomson, J. N. (1983) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/0012-1606(83)90201-4 · Cited by 4,199
A transcriptional profile of multicellular development in Dictyostelium discoideum
Van Driessche, N., Shaw, C., Katoh, M., Morio, T., Sucgang, R., Ibarra, M., Kuwayama, H., Saito, T., Urushihara, H., Maeda, M., et al. (2002) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.129.7.1543 · Cited by 130
Cited by
The maternal-to-zygotic transition revisited
Vastenhouw, N. L., Cao, W. X., & Lipshitz, H. D. (2019) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.161471 · Cited by 445
Unmasking Activation of the Zygotic Genome Using Chromosomal Deletions in the Drosophila Embryo
De Renzis, S., Elemento, O., Tavazoie, S., & Wieschaus, E. F. (2007) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050117 · Cited by 265
The Structure and Dynamics of C. elegans Tubulin Reveals the Mechanistic Basis of Microtubule Growth
Chaaban, S., Jariwala, S., Hsu, C.-T., Redemann, S., Kollman, J. M., Müller-Reichert, T., Sept, D., Bui, K. H., & Brouhard, G. J. (2018) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2018.08.023 · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Baugh, L. R., Hill, A. A., Slonim, D. K., Brown, E. L., & Hunter, C. P.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2003-03-01
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 889-900
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2157746260
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.