The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Shaping the zebrafish notochord
Open accessAbstract
Promptly after the notochord domain is specified in the vertebrate dorsal mesoderm, it undergoes dramatic morphogenesis. Beginning during gastrulation,convergence and extension movements change a squat cellular array into a narrow, elongated one that defines the primary axis of the embryo. Convergence and extension might be coupled by a highly organized cellular intermixing known as mediolateral intercalation behavior (MIB). To learn whether MIB drives early morphogenesis of the zebrafish notochord, we made 4D recordings and quantitatively analyzed both local cellular interactions and global changes in the shape of the dorsal mesodermal field. We show that MIB appears to mediate convergence and can account for extension throughout the dorsal mesoderm. Comparing the notochord and adjacent somitic mesoderm reveals that extension can be regulated separately from convergence. Moreover, mutational analysis shows that extension does not require convergence. Hence, a cellular machine separate from MIB that can drive dorsal mesodermal extension exists in the zebrafish gastrula. The likely redundant control of morphogenesis may provide for plasticity at this critical stage of early development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Silberblick/Wnt11 mediates convergent extension movements during zebrafish gastrulation
Heisenberg, C.-P., Tada, M., Rauch, G.-J., Saúde, L., Concha, M. L., Geisler, R., Stemple, D. L., Smith, J. C., & Wilson, S. W. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35011068 · Cited by 1,013
Dishevelled controls cell polarity during Xenopus gastrulation
Wallingford, J. B., Rowning, B. A., Vogeli, K. M., Rothbächer, U., Fraser, S. E., & Harland, R. M. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35011077 · Cited by 751
A homeobox gene essential for zebrafish notochord development
Talbot, W. S., Trevarrow, B., Halpern, M. E., Melby, A. E., Farr, G., Postlethwait, J. H., Jowett, T., Kimmel, C. B., & Kimelman, D. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/378150a0 · Cited by 465 · cited 2×
“The notochord domain is about 20 cells wide in the early gastrula (as determined from expression of the Not gene floating headat 6 hpf) (see Melby et al., 1996; Talbot et al., 1995).”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Cited by
Frizzled/PCP signalling: a conserved mechanism regulating cell polarity and directed motility
Seifert, J. R. K., & Mlodzik, M. (2007) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2042 · Cited by 513
How we are shaped: The biomechanics of gastrulation
Keller, R., Davidson, L. A., & Shook, D. R. (2003) · Differentiation · doi:10.1046/j.1432-0436.2003.710301.x · Cited by 494
Conserved Patterns of Cell Movements during Vertebrate Gastrulation
Solnica-Krezel, L. (2005) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.03.016 · Cited by 391
Tissue tectonics: morphogenetic strain rates, cell shape change and intercalation
Blanchard, G. B., Kabla, A. J., Schultz, N. L., Butler, L. C., Sanson, B., Gorfinkiel, N., Mahadevan, L., & Adams, R. J. (2009) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1327 · Cited by 302
Self-citationThe amniote primitive streak is defined by epithelial cell intercalation before gastrulation
Voiculescu, O., Bertocchini, F., Wolpert, L., Keller, R. E., & Stern, C. D. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06211 · Cited by 261
Metadata
- Authors
- Glickman, N. S., Kimmel, C. B., Jones, M. A., & Adams, R. J.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2003-03-01
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 873-887
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2085966480
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.