The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Wnt11 and Ret/Gdnf pathways cooperate in regulating ureteric branching during metanephric kidney development
Abstract
Reciprocal cell-cell interactions between the ureteric epithelium and the metanephric mesenchyme are needed to drive growth and differentiation of the embryonic kidney to completion. Branching morphogenesis of the Wolffian duct derived ureteric bud is integral in the generation of ureteric tips and the elaboration of the collecting duct system. Wnt11, a member of the Wnt superfamily of secreted glycoproteins, which have important regulatory functions during vertebrate embryonic development, is specifically expressed in the tips of the branching ureteric epithelium. In this work, we explore the role of Wnt11 in ureteric branching and use a targeted mutation of the Wnt11 locus as an entrance point into investigating the genetic control of collecting duct morphogenesis. Mutation of the Wnt11 gene results in ureteric branching morphogenesis defects and consequent kidney hypoplasia in newborn mice. Wnt11 functions, in part, by maintaining normal expression levels of the gene encoding glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor (Gdnf). Gdnf encodes a mesenchymally produced ligand for the Ret tyrosine kinase receptor that is crucial for normal ureteric branching. Conversely, Wnt11 expression is reduced in the absence of Ret/Gdnf signaling. Consistent with the idea that reciprocal interaction between Wnt11 and Ret/Gdnf regulates the branching process, Wnt11 and Ret mutations synergistically interact in ureteric branching morphogenesis. Based on these observations, we conclude that Wnt11 and Ret/Gdnf cooperate in a positive autoregulatory feedback loop to coordinate ureteric branching by maintaining an appropriate balance of Wnt11-expressing ureteric epithelium and Gdnf-expressing mesenchyme to ensure continued metanephric development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Silberblick/Wnt11 mediates convergent extension movements during zebrafish gastrulation
Heisenberg, C.-P., Tada, M., Rauch, G.-J., Saúde, L., Concha, M. L., Geisler, R., Stemple, D. L., Smith, J. C., & Wilson, S. W. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35011068 · Cited by 1,013
Marlow, F., Topczewski, J., Sepich, D., & Solnica-Krezel, L. (2002) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(02)00864-3 · Cited by 337
Djiane, A., Riou, J.-F., Umbhauer, M., Boucaut, J.-C., & Shi, D.-L. (2000) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.127.14.3091 · Cited by 316
Cited by
The Wnt Signaling Pathway in Development and Disease
Logan, C. Y., & Nusse, R. (2004) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.20.010403.113126 · Cited by 5,325
Simons, M., Gloy, J., Ganner, A., Bullerkotte, A., Bashkurov, M., Krönig, C., Schermer, B., Benzing, T., Cabello, O. A., Jenny, A., et al. (2005) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1552 · Cited by 767
Tao, Q., Yokota, C., Puck, H., Kofron, M., Birsoy, B., Yan, D., Asashima, M., Wylie, C. C., Lin, X., & Heasman, J. (2005) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.01.013 · Cited by 510
LDL-receptor-related protein 4 is crucial for formation of the neuromuscular junction
Weatherbee, S. D., Anderson, K. V., & Niswander, L. A. (2006) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.02696 · Cited by 351
Cessation of renal morphogenesis in mice
Hartman, H. A., Lai, H. L., & Patterson, L. T. (2007) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.08.021 · Cited by 305
Metadata
- Authors
- Majumdar, A., Vainio, S., Kispert, A., McMahon, J., & McMahon, A. P.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2003-07-15
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 3175-3185
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W1977466966
- Cited by
- 482
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.