The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neural crest induction by paraxial mesoderm in Xenopus embryos requires FGF signals
Abstract
At the border of the neural plate, the induction of the neural crest can be achieved by interactions with the epidermis, or with the underlying mesoderm. Wnt signals are required for the inducing activity of the epidermis in chick and amphibian embryos. Here, we analyze the molecular mechanisms of neural crest induction by the mesoderm in Xenopus embryos. Using a recombination assay, we show that prospective paraxial mesoderm induces a panel of neural crest markers (Slug, FoxD3, Zic5 and Sox9),whereas the future axial mesoderm only induces a subset of these genes. This induction is blocked by a dominant negative (dn) form of FGFR1. However,neither dnFGFR4a nor inhibition of Wnt signaling prevents neural crest induction in this system. Among the FGFs, FGF8 is strongly expressed by the paraxial mesoderm. FGF8 is sufficient to induce the neural crest markers FoxD3, Sox9 and Zic5 transiently in the animal cap assay. In vivo, FGF8 injections also expand the Slug expression domain. This suggests that FGF8 can initiate neural crest formation and cooperates with other DLMZ-derived factors to maintain and complete neural crest induction. In contrast to Wnts, eFGF or bFGF, FGF8 elicits neural crest induction in the absence of mesoderm induction and without a requirement for BMP antagonists. In vivo, it is difficult to dissociate the roles of FGF and WNT factors in mesoderm induction and neural patterning. We show that, in most cases, effects on neural crest formation were parallel to altered mesoderm or neural development. However, neural and neural crest patterning can be dissociated experimentally using different dominant-negative manipulations:while Nfz8 blocks both posterior neural plate formation and neural crest formation, dnFGFR4a blocks neural patterning without blocking neural crest formation. These results suggest that different signal transduction mechanisms may be used in neural crest induction, and anteroposterior neural patterning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jin, C., & Reed, J. C. (2002) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm832 · Cited by 340
The transcription factor Sox9 is required for cranial neural crest development in Xenopus
Spokony, R. F., Aoki, Y., Saint-Germain, N., Magner-Fink, E., & Saint-Jeannet, J.-P. (2002) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.129.2.421 · Cited by 295
Cited by
Establishing neural crest identity: a gene regulatory recipe
Simões-Costa, M., & Bronner, M. E. (2015) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.105445 · Cited by 649
Fibroblast Growth Factor Signaling during Early Vertebrate Development
Böttcher, R. T., & Niehrs, C. (2005) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2003-0040 · Cited by 540
Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling in development and skeletal diseases
Teven, C. M., Farina, E. M., Rivas, J., & Reid, R. R. (2014) · Genes & Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.gendis.2014.09.005 · Cited by 237
Reiterative AP2a activity controls sequential steps in the neural crest gene regulatory network
de Crozé, N., Maczkowiak, F., & Monsoro-Burq, A. H. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1010740107 · Cited by 166
Self-citationLi, B., Kuriyama, S., Moreno, M., & Mayor, R. (2009) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.036954 · Cited by 149
Metadata
- Authors
- Monsoro-Burq, A.-H., Fletcher, R. B., & Harland, R. M.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2003-07-15
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 3111-3124
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2068279595
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.