The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Interactions between Fat and Dachsous and the regulation of planar cell polarity in the Drosophila wing
Abstract
It was recently suggested that a proximal to distal gradient of the protocadherin Dachsous (Ds) acts as a cue for planar cell polarity (PCP) in the Drosophila wing, orienting cell-cell interactions by inhibiting the activity of the protocadherin Fat (Ft). This Ft-Ds signaling model is based on mutant loss-of-function phenotypes, leaving open the question of whether Ds is instructive or permissive for PCP. We developed tools for misexpressing ds and ft in vitro and in vivo, and have used these to test aspects of the model. First, this model predicts that Ds and Ft can bind. We show that Ft and Ds mediate preferentially heterophilic cell adhesion in vitro, and that each stabilizes the other on the cell surface. Second, the model predicts that artificial gradients of Ds are sufficient to reorient PCP in the wing; our data confirms this prediction. Finally,loss-of-function phenotypes suggest that the gradient of dsexpression is necessary for correct PCP throughout the wing. Surprisingly,this is not the case. Uniform levels of ds drive normally oriented PCP and, in all but the most proximal regions of the wing, uniform dsrescues the ds mutant PCP phenotype. Nor are distal PCP defects increased by the loss of spatial information from the distally expressed four-jointed (fj) gene, which encodes putative modulator of Ft-Ds signaling. Thus, while our results support the existence of Ft-Ds binding and show that it is sufficient to alter PCP, ds expression is permissive or redundant with other PCP cues in much of the wing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Zhao, B., Wei, X., Li, W., Udan, R. S., Yang, Q., Kim, J., Xie, J., Ikenoue, T., Yu, J., Li, L., et al. (2007) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1602907 · Cited by 3,092
The Hippo pathway: regulators and regulations.
Yu, F.-X., & Guan, K.-L. (2013) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.210773.112 · Cited by 1,231
The Salvador–Warts–Hippo pathway — an emerging tumour-suppressor network
Harvey, K., & Tapon, N. (2007) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2070 · Cited by 628
Planar cell polarity in development and disease
Butler, M. T., & Wallingford, J. B. (2017) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm.2017.11 · Cited by 580
Principles of planar polarity in animal development
Goodrich, L. V., & Strutt, D. (2011) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.054080 · Cited by 579
Frizzled/PCP signalling: a conserved mechanism regulating cell polarity and directed motility
Seifert, J. R. K., & Mlodzik, M. (2007) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2042 · Cited by 513
The Fat Cadherin Acts through the Hippo Tumor-Suppressor Pathway to Regulate Tissue Size
Willecke, M., Hamaratoglu, F., Kango-Singh, M., Udan, R., Chen, C.-L., Tao, C., Zhang, X., & Halder, G. (2006) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2006.09.005 · Cited by 329
The cell biology of planar cell polarity
Devenport, D. (2014) · Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201408039 · Cited by 323
Zecca, M., & Struhl, G. (2010) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000386 · Cited by 148
Regulation of cell polarity by cell adhesion receptors
Ebnet, K., Kummer, D., Steinbacher, T., Singh, A., Nakayama, M., & Matis, M. (2018) · Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.07.032 · Cited by 52
Contributions of the Dachsous intracellular domain to Dachsous-Fat signaling
Tripathi, B. K., & Irvine, K. D. (2024) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.202919 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Matakatsu, H., & Blair, S. S.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2004-08-01
- Volume
- 131
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 3785-3794
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2060114324
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.