Cited by 108Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationCongenital heart defects research

Neurogenin 2 has an essential role in development of the dentate gyrus

Galichet, Christophe, Guillemot, François, Parras, Carlos M.·2008·Development

Abstract

The dentate gyrus (DG) of the hippocampus has a central role in learning and memory in adult rodents. The DG is generated soon after birth, although new neurons continue to be generated in the DG throughout life. The proneural factors Mash1 (Ascl1) and neurogenin 2 (Ngn2) are expressed during formation of the DG but their role in the development of this structure has not yet been addressed. Here, we show that Ngn2 is essential for the development of the DG. Ngn2 mutant mice have fewer DG progenitors and these cells present defects in neuronal differentiation. By contrast, the DG is normal in Mash1 mutant mice at birth, and loss of both Mash1 and Ngn2 does not aggravate the defect observed in Ngn2 single mutants. These data establish a unique role of Ngn2 in DG neurogenesis during development and raise the possibility that Ngn2 has a similar function in adult neurogenesis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/dev.015115

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ngn2-dependent control of HuD transcription is central to neuronal development, function, and dysfunction.

    “Given the established function of Ngn2 in neurogenesis (Guillemot 2007) and its emerging roles in learning and memory (Galichet et al. 2008) and neuronal diseases (Rostomily et al. 1997; Andersson et al. 2006; Kele et al. 2006; Uhrig et al. 2009), our findings suggest that Ngn2-dependent control of HuD transcription is central to neuronal development, function, and dysfunction (Fig. 4D).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Galichet, C., Guillemot, F., & Parras, C. M.
Affiliations
  • National Institute for Medical Research (GB)
  • Division of Molecular Neurobiology, National Institute of Medical Research, The Ridgeway, Mill Hill, NW7 1AA London, UK.
Venue
Development
Published
2008-06-01
Volume
135
Issue
11
Pages
2031-2041
ISSN
  • 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9129
OpenAlex
W2019898412
Cited by
108
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 12
FWCI
2.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Congenital heart defects research
Keywords
Neurogenin2, dentate gyrus, hippocampus development, proneural genes, ASCL1, neuronal differentiation, neural progenitor cells, adult neurogenesis
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Differentiation, Female, Hippocampus, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neurons, In Situ Hybridization, Mice, Knockout, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Dentate Gyrus, In Situ Nick-End Labeling, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Mice, Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review