Cited by 110Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationGene Regulatory Network AnalysisPhilosophy and History of Science

Regulative feedback in pattern formation: towards a general relativistic theory of positional information

Jaeger, Johannes, Irons, David, Monk, Nick·2008·Development

Abstract

Positional specification by morphogen gradients is traditionally viewed as a two-step process. A gradient is formed and then interpreted, providing a spatial metric independent of the target tissue, similar to the concept of space in classical mechanics. However, the formation and interpretation of gradients are coupled, dynamic processes. We introduce a conceptual framework for positional specification in which cellular activity feeds back on positional information encoded by gradients, analogous to the feedback between mass-energy distribution and the geometry of space-time in Einstein's general theory of relativity. We discuss how such general relativistic positional information (GRPI) can guide systems-level approaches to pattern formation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/dev.018697

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A lone morphogen is not sufficient to explain developmental patterning.

    “The existence of this regulation is not surprising, as physical arguments show that a lone morphogen is not sufficient to explain developmental patterning (Lander 2007;Jaeger et al. 2008).”

    From Graded dorsal and differential gene regulation in the Drosophila embryo. (2009) · cites this paper as Jaeger et al. 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 97 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jaeger, J., Irons, D., & Monk, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Jaeger, Johannes
Venue
Development
Published
2008-10-01
Volume
135
Issue
19
Pages
3175-3183
ISSN
  • 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9129
OpenAlex
W1967671268
Cited by
110
References
97
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 14
FWCI
0.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/F005873/1)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
Keywords
positional information, morphogen gradients, pattern formation, feedback, general relativity analogy, morphogenesis
MeSH terms
Animals, Drosophila melanogaster, Models, Biological, Systems Theory, Vertebrates, Genes, Insect, Body Patterning, Feedback, Physiological, Hedgehog Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review