The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Klf4 reverts developmentally programmed restriction of ground state pluripotency
Open accessAbstract
Mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells derived from pluripotent early epiblast contribute functionally differentiated progeny to all foetal lineages of chimaeras. By contrast, epistem cell (EpiSC) lines from post-implantation epithelialised epiblast are unable to colonise the embryo even though they express the core pluripotency genes Oct4, Sox2 and Nanog. We examined interconversion between these two cell types. ES cells can readily become EpiSCs in response to growth factor cues. By contrast, EpiSCs do not change into ES cells. We exploited PiggyBac transposition to introduce a single reprogramming factor, Klf4, into EpiSCs. No effect was apparent in EpiSC culture conditions, but in ground state ES cell conditions a fraction of cells formed undifferentiated colonies. These EpiSC-derived induced pluripotent stem (Epi-iPS) cells activated expression of ES cell-specific transcripts including endogenous Klf4, and downregulated markers of lineage specification. X chromosome silencing in female cells, a feature of the EpiSC state, was erased in Epi-iPS cells. They produced high-contribution chimaeras that yielded germline transmission. These properties were maintained after Cre-mediated deletion of the Klf4transgene, formally demonstrating complete and stable reprogramming of developmental phenotype. Thus, re-expression of Klf4 in an appropriate environment can regenerate the naïve ground state from EpiSCs. Reprogramming is dependent on suppression of extrinsic growth factor stimuli and proceeds to completion in less than 1% of cells. This substantiates the argument that EpiSCs are developmentally, epigenetically and functionally differentiated from ES cells. However, because a single transgene is the minimum requirement to attain the ground state, EpiSCs offer an attractive opportunity for screening for unknown components of the reprogramming process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal
Ying, Q.-L., Wray, J., Nichols, J., Batlle-Morera, L., Doble, B., Woodgett, J., Cohen, P., & Smith, A. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06968 · Cited by 3,442
Self-citationChanging potency by spontaneous fusion
Ying, Q.-L., Nichols, J., Evans, E. P., & Smith, A. G. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature729 · Cited by 1,494
Self-citation
Cited by
Reconstitution of the Mouse Germ Cell Specification Pathway in Culture by Pluripotent Stem Cells
Hayashi, K., Ohta, H., Kurimoto, K., Aramaki, S., & Saitou, M. (2011) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.06.052 · Cited by 1,379
Li, R., Liang, J., Ni, S., Zhou, T., Qing, X., Li, H., He, W., Chen, J., Li, F., Zhuang, Q., et al. (2010) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2010.04.014 · Cited by 1,072
Self-citationNanog Is the Gateway to the Pluripotent Ground State
Silva, J., Nichols, J., Theunissen, T. W., Guo, G., van Oosten, A. L., Barrandon, O., Wray, J., Yamanaka, S., Chambers, I., & Smith, A. (2009) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.039 · Cited by 1,031
Self-citationHuman iPSC-based modeling of late-onset disease via progerin-induced aging
Miller, J. D., Ganat, Y. M., Kishinevsky, S., Bowman, R. L., Liu, B., Tu, E. Y., Mandal, P. K., Vera, E., Shim, J.-W., Kriks, S., et al. (2013) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2013.11.006 · Cited by 777
Dynamic stem cell states: Naive to primed pluripotency in rodents and humans
Weinberger, L., Ayyash, M., Novershtern, N., & Hanna, J. H. (2016) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm.2015.28 · Cited by 622
Metadata
- Authors
- Guo, G., Yang, J., Nichols, J., Hall, J. S., Eyres, I., Mansfield, W., & Smith, A.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2009-04-01
- Volume
- 136
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1063-1069
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2105241566
- Cited by
- 765
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 27.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.