The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
FGF signal-dependent segregation of primitive endoderm and epiblast in the mouse blastocyst
Abstract
Primitive endoderm (PE) and epiblast (EPI) are two lineages derived from the inner cell mass (ICM) of the E3.5 blastocyst. Recent studies showed that EPI and PE progenitors expressing the lineage-specific transcriptional factors Nanog and Gata6, respectively, arise progressively as the ICM develops. Subsequent sorting of the two progenitors during blastocyst maturation results in the ormation of morphologically distinct EPI and PE layers at E4.5. It is, however, unknown how the initial differences between the two populations become established in the E3.5 blastocyst. Because the ICM cells are derived from two distinct rounds of polarized cell divisions during cleavage, a possible role for cell lineage history in promoting EPI versus PE fate has been proposed. We followed cell lineage from the eight-cell stage by live cell tracing and could find no clear linkage between developmental history of individual ICM cells and later cell fate. However, modulating FGF signaling levels by inhibition of the receptor/MAP kinase pathway or by addition of exogenous FGF shifted the fate of ICM cells to become either EPI or PE, respectively. Nanog- or Gata6-expressing progenitors could still be shifted towards the alternative fate by modulating FGF signaling during blastocyst maturation, suggesting that the ICM progenitors are not fully committed to their final fate at the time that initial segregation of gene expression occurs. In conclusion, we propose a model in which stochastic and progressive specification of EPI and PE lineages occurs during maturation of the blastocyst in an FGF/MAP kinase signal-dependent manner.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal
Ying, Q.-L., Wray, J., Nichols, J., Batlle-Morera, L., Doble, B., Woodgett, J., Cohen, P., & Smith, A. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06968 · Cited by 3,442
E-cadherin null mutant embryos fail to form a trophectoderm epithelium.
Larue, L., Ohsugi, M., Hirchenhain, J., & Kemler, R. (1994) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.91.17.8263 · Cited by 930
Chazaud, C., Yamanaka, Y., Pawson, T., & Rossant, J. (2006) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2006.02.020 · Cited by 898
Self-citation
Cited by
The Fibroblast Growth Factor signaling pathway
Ornitz, D. M., & Itoh, N. (2015) · WIREs Developmental Biology · doi:10.1002/wdev.176 · Cited by 2,050
Single-Cell RNA-Seq Reveals Lineage and X Chromosome Dynamics in Human Preimplantation Embryos
Petropoulos, S., Edsgärd, D., Reinius, B., Deng, Q., Panula, S. P., Codeluppi, S., Plaza Reyes, A., Linnarsson, S., Sandberg, R., & Lanner, F. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.03.023 · Cited by 1,063
Self-citationHeterogeneity in Oct4 and Sox2 Targets Biases Cell Fate in 4-Cell Mouse Embryos
Goolam, M., Scialdone, A., Graham, S. J. L., Macaulay, I. C., Jedrusik, A., Hupalowska, A., Voet, T., Marioni, J. C., & Zernicka-Goetz, M. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.047 · Cited by 484
Boroviak, T., Loos, R., Bertone, P., Smith, A., & Nichols, J. (2014) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb2965 · Cited by 441
Lineage specification in the mouse preimplantation embryo
Chazaud, C., & Yamanaka, Y. (2016) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.128314 · Cited by 317
Self-citationOhnishi, Y., Huber, W., Tsumura, A., Kang, M., Xenopoulos, P., Kurimoto, K., Oleś, A. K., Araúzo-Bravo, M. J., Saitou, M., Hadjantonakis, A.-K., et al. (2014) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb2881 · Cited by 300
Kang, M., Piliszek, A., Artus, J., & Hadjantonakis, A.-K. (2013) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.084996 · Cited by 284
GATA6 Levels Modulate Primitive Endoderm Cell Fate Choice and Timing in the Mouse Blastocyst
Schrode, N., Saiz, N., Di Talia, S., & Hadjantonakis, A.-K. (2014) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2014.04.011 · Cited by 238
Molotkov, A., Mazot, P., Brewer, J. R., Cinalli, R. M., & Soriano, P. (2017) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2017.05.004 · Cited by 177
Kang, M., Garg, V., & Hadjantonakis, A.-K. (2017) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2017.05.003 · Cited by 174
Network inference with Granger causality ensembles on single-cell transcriptomics
Deshpande, A., Chu, L.-F., Stewart, R., & Gitter, A. (2022) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110333 · Cited by 130
Takaoka, K., Yamamoto, M., & Hamada, H. (2011) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb2251 · Cited by 127
BMP signaling induces visceral endoderm differentiation of XEN cells and parietal endoderm
Paca, A., Séguin, C. A., Clements, M., Ryczko, M., Rossant, J., Rodriguez, T. A., & Kunath, T. (2012) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.10.013 · Cited by 87
Self-citationA Sprouty4 reporter to monitor FGF/ERK signaling activity in ESCs and mice
Morgani, S. M., Saiz, N., Garg, V., Raina, D., Simon, C. S., Kang, M., Arias, A. M., Nichols, J., Schröter, C., & Hadjantonakis, A.-K. (2018) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2018.06.017 · Cited by 55
Athanasouli, P., Balli, M., De Jaime-Soguero, A., Boel, A., Papanikolaou, S., van der Veer, B. K., Janiszewski, A., Vanhessche, T., Francis, A., El Laithy, Y., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-36914-1 · Cited by 31
Brinkhof, B., van Tol, H. T., Groot Koerkamp, M. J., Riemers, F. M., IJzer, S. G., Mashayekhi, K., Haagsman, H. P., & Roelen, B. A. (2015) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-015-1448-x · Cited by 26
The road to regenerative liver therapies: the triumphs, trials and tribulations
Raju, R., Chau, D., Verfaillie, C. M., & Hu, W.-S. (2013) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.08.022 · Cited by 14
(2025) · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf581 · Cited by 6
Single‐cell pluripotency regulatory networks
Stumpf, P. S., Ewing, R., & MacArthur, B. D. (2016) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.201500528 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Yamanaka, Y., Lanner, F., & Rossant, J.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2010-03-01
- Volume
- 137
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 715-724
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2022959322
- Cited by
- 576
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 16.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
