The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Early onset of phenotype and cell patterning in the embryonic zebrafish retina
Abstract
The regular arrangement of retinal cone cells in a mosaic pattern is a common feature of teleosts. In the zebrafish, Brachydanio rerio, the retinal cone mosaic comprises parallel rows consisting of a repeating motif of four cone types. In order to elucidate the temporal and spatial aspects of the genesis of the cone mosaic in the developing retina, we generated a monoclonal antibody that specifically binds to the double cone photoreceptor of the adult. We first saw staining in the developing retina with this antibody, FRet 43, at 48 hours postfertilization, the time at which the first photoreceptor cells undergo their final mitotic division. We then injected embryonic fish with the thymidine analog, 5-bromo-2‘-deoxyuridine (BrdU), confirming with a double-labeling experiment that the onset of FRet 43 antigenicity occurs within three hours of the cellular division that generates the double cone photoreceptors. Then we stained tangential sections of the 54-hour embryonic retina with FRet 43, further showing that cells devoid of staining alternate with stained pairs of cells in a pattern that is consistent with the arrangement of photoreceptors in the adult cone mosaic. These results indicate that a marker of the double cone phenotype is expressed at approximately the same time as cellular birthday and that the mosaic patterning is present within 6 hours of this expression.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organization of hindbrain segments in the zebrafish embryo
Trevarrow, B., Marks, D. L., & Kimmel, C. B. (1990) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/0896-6273(90)90194-k · Cited by 506
SEGREGATION ANALYSES AND GENE-CENTROMERE DISTANCES IN ZEBRAFISH
Streisinger, G., Singer, F., Walker, C., Knauber, D., & Dower, N. (1986) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/112.2.311 · Cited by 245
Cited by
Bernardos, R. L., Barthel, L. K., Meyers, J. R., & Raymond, P. A. (2007) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1624-07.2007 · Cited by 647
A Role for 1 Tubulin-Expressing Muller Glia in Regeneration of the Injured Zebrafish Retina
Fausett, B. V., & Goldman, D. (2006) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0332-06.2006 · Cited by 435
Zebrafish Differentially Process Color across Visual Space to Match Natural Scenes
Zimmermann, M. J. Y., Nevala, N. E., Yoshimatsu, T., Osorio, D., Nilsson, D.-E., Berens, P., & Baden, T. (2018) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2018.04.075 · Cited by 227
Noncell-autonomous photoreceptor degeneration in a zebrafish model of choroideremia
Krock, B. L., Bilotta, J., & Perkins, B. D. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0605818104 · Cited by 79
Collery, R., McLoughlin, S., Vendrell, V., Finnegan, J., Crabb, J. W., Saari, J. C., & Kennedy, B. N. (2008) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.08-1957 · Cited by 56
Lane, B. M., & Lister, J. A. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049357 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Larison, K. D., & Bremiller, R.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1990-07-01
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 567-576
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W1902196155
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.