The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Genetic interactions among floral homeotic genes of Arabidopsis
Abstract
We describe allelic series for three loci, mutations in which result in homeotic conversions in two adjacent whorls in the Arabidopsis thaliana flower. Both the structure of the mature flower and its development from the initial primordium are described by scanning electron microscopy. New mutations at the APETALA2 locus, ap2-2, ap2-8 and ap2-9, cause homeotic conversions in the outer two whorls: sepals to carpels (or leaves) and petals to stamens. Two new mutations of PISTILLATA, pi-2 and pi-3, cause second and third whorl organs to differentiate incorrectly. Homeotic conversions are petals to sepals and stamens to carpels, a pattern similar to that previously described for the apetala3-l mutation. The AGAMOUS mutations, ag-2 and ag-3, affect the third and fourth whorls and cause petals to develop instead of stamens and another flower to arise in place of the gynoecium. In addition to homeotic changes, mutations at the APETALA2, APETALAS and PISTILLATA loci may lead to reduced numbers of organs, or even their absence, in specific whorls. The bud and flower phenotypes of doubly and triply mutant strains, constructed with these and previously described alleles, are also described. Based on these results, a model is proposed that suggests that the products of these homeotic genes are each active in fields occupying two adjacent whorls, AP2 in the two outer whorls, PI and AP3 in whorls two and three, and AG in the two inner whorls. In combination, therefore, the gene products in these three concentric, overlapping fields specify the four types of organs in the wild-type flower. Further, the phenotypes of multiple mutant lines indicate that the wild-type products of the AGAMOUS and APETALA2 genes interact antagonistically. AP2 seems to keep the AG gene inactive in the two outer whorls while the converse is likely in the two inner whorls. This field model successfully predicts the phenotypes of all the singly, doubly and triply mutant flowers described.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A MicroRNA as a Translational Repressor of APETALA2 in Arabidopsis Flower Development
Chen, X. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1088060 · Cited by 1,770
Souer, E., van Houwelingen, A., Kloos, D., Mol, J., & Koes, R. (1996) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81093-4 · Cited by 1,059
Molecular mechanisms of flower development: an armchair guide
Krizek, B. A., & Fletcher, J. C. (2005) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1675 · Cited by 624
Model for the regulation of Arabidopsis thaliana leaf margin development
Bilsborough, G. D., Runions, A., Barkoulas, M., Jenkins, H. W., Hasson, A., Galinha, C., Laufs, P., Hay, A., Prusinkiewicz, P., & Tsiantis, M. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1015162108 · Cited by 467
Mizukami, Y., & Ma, H. (1992) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(92)90271-d · Cited by 455
A developmental framework for dissected leaf formation in the Arabidopsis relative Cardamine hirsuta
Barkoulas, M., Hay, A., Kougioumoutzi, E., & Tsiantis, M. (2008) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.189 · Cited by 329
Phan, H. A., Iacuone, S., Li, S. F., & Parish, R. W. (2011) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.110.082651 · Cited by 293
Lavie, O., Smadga, A., Elharar, I., Moshe, U., Faigenboim, A., Levy, M., Ravid, J., Spitzer-Rimon, B., & Eshed Williams, L. (2026) · BMC Plant Biology · doi:10.1186/s12870-026-08639-y
Metadata
- Authors
- Bowman, J. L., Smyth, D. R., & Meyerowitz, E. M.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1991-05-01
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-20
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W1897909359
- Cited by
- 1,166
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 47.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.