The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Production of antisense RNA leads to effective and specific inhibition of gene expression in C. elegans muscle
Abstract
We have used an antisense strategy to effectively disrupt the expression of two genes encoding myofilament proteins present in C. elegans body wall muscles. DNA segments from the unc-22 and unc-54 genes have been placed in reverse orientation in vectors designed to produce RNA in body wall muscles. When the resulting plasmids are injected into oocytes, progeny with defects in muscle function are produced. These animals have phenotypes consistent with reduction and/or elimination of function of the gene to which antisense RNA has been produced: twitching and disorganization of muscle filaments for the unc-22 antisense constructs and lack of muscle tone, slow movement, and egg laying defects for the unc-54 antisense constructs. A fraction of the affected animals transmit the defective-muscle trait to subsequent generations. In these cases the transforming DNA is present at high copy number and cosegregates with the observed muscle defects. We have examined several of the unc-22 antisense plasmid transformed lines to determine the mechanistic basis for the observed phenotypes. The RNA product of the endogenous unc-22 locus is present at normal levels and this RNA is properly spliced in the region homologous to the antisense RNA. No evidence for modification of this RNA by deamination of adenosine to inosine was found. In affected animals the level of protein product from the endogenous unc-22 locus is greatly reduced. Antisense RNA produced from the transforming DNA was detected and was much more abundant than ‘sense’ RNA from the endogenous locus. These data suggest that the observed phenotypes result from interference with a late step in gene expression, such as transport into the cytoplasm or translation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Primer-Directed Enzymatic Amplification of DNA with a Thermostable DNA Polymerase
Saiki, R. K., Gelfand, D. H., Stoffel, S., Scharf, S. J., Higuchi, R., Horn, G. T., Mullis, K. B., & Erlich, H. A. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2448875 · Cited by 17,719
Cited by
Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans
Fire, A., Xu, S., Montgomery, M. K., Kostas, S. A., Driver, S. E., & Mello, C. C. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35888 · Cited by 15,429
Self-citationThe current state and future directions of RNAi-based therapeutics
Setten, R. L., Rossi, J. J., & Han, S.-P. (2019) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41573-019-0017-4 · Cited by 1,443
Guo, S., & Kemphues, K. J. (1995) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(95)90082-9 · Cited by 1,122
Non-coding RNAs as regulators of gene expression and epigenetics
Kaikkonen, M. U., Lam, M. T. Y., & Glass, C. K. (2011) · Cardiovascular Research · doi:10.1093/cvr/cvr097 · Cited by 764
C. elegans Dynamin-Related Protein DRP-1 Controls Severing of the Mitochondrial Outer Membrane
Labrousse, A. M., Zappaterra, M. D., Rube, D. A., & van der Bliek, A. M. (1999) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80391-3 · Cited by 670
Metadata
- Authors
- Fire, A., Albertson, D., Harrison, S. W., & Moerman, D. G.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1991-10-01
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 503-514
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W1952115186
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.