The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Regulation of proneural gene expression and cell fate during neuroblast segregation in the Drosophila embryo
Abstract
The Drosophila embryonic central nervous system develops from sets of progenitor neuroblasts which segregate from the neuroectoderm during early embryogenesis. Cells within this region can follow either the neural or epidermal developmental pathway, a decision guided by two opposing classes of genes. The proneural genes, including the members of the achaete-scute complex (AS-C), promote neurogenesis, while the neurogenic genes prevent neurogenesis and facilitate epidermal development. To understand the role that proneural gene expression and regulation play in the choice between neurogenesis and epidermogenesis, we examined the temporal and spatial expression pattern of the achaete (ac) regulatory protein in normal and neurogenic mutant embryos. The ac protein is first expressed in a repeating pattern of four ectodermal cell clusters per hemisegment. Even though 5 –7 cells initially express ac in each cluster, only one, the neuroblast, continues to express ac. The repression of ac in the remaining cells of the cluster requires zygotic neurogenic gene function. In embryos lacking any one of five genes, the restriction of ac expression to single cells does not occur; instead, all cells of each cluster continue to express ac, enlarge, delaminate and become neuroblasts. It appears that one key function of the neurogenic genes is to silence proneural gene expression within the nonsegregating cells of the initial ectodermal clusters, thereby permitting epidermal development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The MyoD DNA binding domain contains a recognition code for muscle-specific gene activation
Davis, R. L., Cheng, P.-F., Lassar, A. B., & Weintraub, H. (1990) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(90)90088-v · Cited by 765
Klämbt, C., Knust, E., Tietze, K., & Campos‐Ortega, J. A. (1989) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03365.x · Cited by 264
Cited by
Conservation of the Notch signalling pathway in mammalian neurogenesis
Luis de la Pompa, J., Wakeham, A., Correia, K. M., Samper, E., Brown, S., Aguilera, R. J., Nakano, T., Honjo, T., Mak, T. W., Rossant, J., et al. (1997) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.124.6.1139 · Cited by 624
Weiss, J. B., Von Ohlen, T., Mellerick, D. M., Dressler, G., Doe, C. Q., & Scott, M. P. (1998) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.12.22.3591 · Cited by 236
McDonald, J. A., Holbrook, S., Isshiki, T., Weiss, J., Doe, C. Q., & Mellerick, D. M. (1998) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.12.22.3603 · Cited by 162
Lacin, H., & Truman, J. W. (2016) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.13399 · Cited by 123
Genetic mechanisms of early neurogenesis inDrosophila melanogaster
Campos-Ortega, J. A. (1995) · Molecular Neurobiology · doi:10.1007/bf02740668 · Cited by 137
Metadata
- Authors
- Skeath, J. B., & Carroll, S. B.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1992-04-01
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 939-946
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W1807161409
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.