The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MyoD and Myf-5 differentially regulate the development of limb versus trunk skeletal muscle
Abstract
The myogenic progenitors of epaxial (paraspinal and intercostal) and hypaxial (limb and abdominal wall) musculature are believed to originate in dorsal-medial and ventral-lateral domains, respectively, of the developing somite. To investigate the hypothesis that Myf-5 and MyoD have different roles in the development of epaxial and hypaxial musculature, we further characterized myogenesis in Myf-5- and MyoD-deficient embryos by several approaches. We examined expression of a MyoD-lacZ transgene in Myf-5 and MyoD mutant embryos to characterize the temporal-spatial patterns of myogenesis in mutant embryos. In addition, we performed immunohistochemistry on sectioned Myf-5 and MyoD mutant embryos with antibodies reactive with desmin, nestin, myosin heavy chain, sarcom-eric actin, Myf-5, MyoD and myogenin. While MyoD-- embryos displayed normal development of paraspinal and intercostal muscles in the body proper, muscle development in limb buds and brachial arches was delayed by about 2.5 days. By contrast, Myf-5−/− embryos displayed normal muscle development in limb buds and brachial arches, and markedly delayed development of paraspinal and intercostal muscles. Although MyoD mutant embryos exhibited delayed development of limb musculature, normal migration of Pax-3-expressing cells into the limb buds and normal subsequent induction of Myf-5 in myogenic precursors was observed. These results suggest that Myf-5 expression in the limb is insufficient for the normal progression of myogenic development. Taken together, these observations strongly support the hypothesis that Myf-5 and MyoD play unique roles in the development of epaxial and hypaxial muscle, respectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
MyoD is required for myogenic stem cell function in adult skeletal muscle
Megeney, L. A., Kablar, B., Garrett, K., Anderson, J. E., & Rudnicki, M. A. (1996) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.10.10.1173 · Cited by 724
Self-citation
Cited by
Satellite Cells and the Muscle Stem Cell Niche
Yin, H., Price, F., & Rudnicki, M. A. (2013) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00043.2011 · Cited by 2,166
Self-citationThe formation of skeletal muscle: from somite to limb
Buckingham, M., Bajard, L., Chang, T., Daubas, P., Hadchouel, J., Meilhac, S., Montarras, D., Rocancourt, D., & Relaix, F. (2003) · Journal of Anatomy · doi:10.1046/j.1469-7580.2003.00139.x · Cited by 916
Molecular mechanisms regulating myogenic determination and differentiation
Perry, R. (2000) · Frontiers in Bioscience · doi:10.2741/perry · Cited by 369
Polycomb-Repressed Genes Have Permissive Enhancers that Initiate Reprogramming
Taberlay, P. C., Kelly, T. K., Liu, C.-C., You, J. S., De Carvalho, D. D., Miranda, T. B., Zhou, X. J., Liang, G., & Jones, P. A. (2011) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.10.040 · Cited by 171
Comai, G., Sambasivan, R., Gopalakrishnan, S., & Tajbakhsh, S. (2014) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2014.11.005 · Cited by 50
Verdejo-Torres, O., Klein, D. C., Novoa-Aponte, L., Carrazco-Carrillo, J., Bonilla-Pinto, D., Rivera, A., Bakhshian, A., Fitisemanu, F. M., Jiménez-González, M. L., Flinn, L., et al. (2024) · PLOS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1011495 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Kablar, B., Krastel, K., Ying, C., Asakura, A., Tapscott, S. J., & Rudnicki, M. A.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1997-12-01
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 4729-4738
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W1835572484
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.