The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
β-catenin signalling modulates proliferative potential of human epidermal keratinocytes independently of intercellular adhesion
Abstract
We found that cultured human keratinocytes with high proliferative potential, the putative epidermal stem cells, expressed a higher level of noncadherin-associated β- catenin than populations enriched for keratinocytes of lower proliferative potential. To investigate the physiological significance of this, a series of β-catenin constructs was introduced into keratinocytes via retroviral infection. Full-length β-catenin and a mutant containing only nine armadillo repeats had little effect on proliferative potential in culture, the full-length protein being rapidly degraded. However, expression of stabilised, N-terminally truncated β-catenin increased the proportion of putative stem cells to almost 90% of the proliferative population in vitro without inducing malignant transformation, and relieved the differentiation stimulatory effect of overexpressing the E-cadherin cytoplasmic domain. Conversely, β-catenin lacking armadillo repeats acted as a dominant negative mutant and stimulated exit from the stem cell compartment in culture. The positive and negative effects of the β-catenin mutants on proliferative potential were independent of effects on cell-cycle kinetics, overt terminal differentiation or intercellular adhesion, and correlated with stimulation or inhibition of transactivation of a TCF/LEF reporter in basal keratinocytes. We conclude that the elevated level of cytoplasmic β-catenin in those keratinocytes with characteristics of epidermal stem cells contributes to their high proliferative potential.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Functional interaction of β-catenin with the transcription factor LEF-1
Behrens, J., von Kries, J. P., Kühl, M., Bruhn, L., Wedlich, D., Grosschedl, R., & Birchmeier, W. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/382638a0 · Cited by 2,912
Fagotto, F., Glück, U., & Gumbiner, B. M. (1998) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(98)70082-x · Cited by 434
Cited by
Stem cells, cancer, and cancer stem cells
Reya, T., Morrison, S. J., Clarke, M. F., & Weissman, I. L. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35102167 · Cited by 9,738
Wnt signalling in stem cells and cancer
Reya, T., & Clevers, H. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03319 · Cited by 3,666
A role for Wnt signalling in self-renewal of haematopoietic stem cells
Reya, T., Duncan, A. W., Ailles, L., Domen, J., Scherer, D. C., Willert, K., Hintz, L., Nusse, R., & Weissman, I. L. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01593 · Cited by 2,159
WNT and β-catenin signalling: diseases and therapies
Moon, R. T., Kohn, A. D., Ferrari, G. V. D., & Kaykas, A. (2004) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1427 · Cited by 1,763
Out of Eden: Stem Cells and Their Niches
Watt, F. M., & Hogan, A. B. L. M. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.287.5457.1427 · Cited by 1,758
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhu, A. J., & Watt, F. M.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1999-05-15
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2285-2298
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2346241491
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.