The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Extrinsic and intrinsic factors control the genesis of amacrine and cone cells in the rat retina
Abstract
The seven major classes of cells of the vertebrate neural retina are generated from a pool of multipotent progenitor cells. Recent studies suggest a model of retinal development in which both the progenitor cells and the environment change over time (Cepko, C. L., Austin, C. P., Yang, X., Alexiades, M. and Ezzeddine, D. (1996). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 589-595). We have utilized a reaggregate culture system to test this model. A labeled population of progenitors from the embryonic rat retina were cultured with an excess of postnatal retinal cells and then assayed for their cell fate choices. We found that the postnatal environment had at least two signals that affected the embryonic cells’ choice of fate; one signal inhibited the production of amacrine cells and a second affected the production of cone cells. No increase in cell types generated postnatally was observed. The source of the inhibitor of the amacrine cell fate appeared to be previously generated amacrine cells, suggesting that amacrine cell number is controlled by feedback inhibition. The progenitor cell lost its ability to be inhibited for production of an amacrine cell as it entered M phase of the cell cycle. We suggest that postmitotic cells influence progenitor cell fate decisions, but that they do so in a manner restricted by the intrinsic biases of progenitor cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Genomic Analysis of Mouse Retinal Development
Blackshaw, S., Harpavat, S., Trimarchi, J., Cai, L., Huang, H., Kuo, W. P., Weber, G., Lee, K., Fraioli, R. E., Cho, S.-H., et al. (2004) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020247 · Cited by 585
Self-citationRequirement for math5 in the development of retinal ganglion cells
Wang, S. W., Kim, B. S., Ding, K., Wang, H., Sun, D., Johnson, R. L., Klein, W. H., & Gan, L. (2001) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.855301 · Cited by 461
Temporal fate specification and neural progenitor competence during development
Kohwi, M., & Doe, C. Q. (2013) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3618 · Cited by 366
Math5 determines the competence state of retinal ganglion cell progenitors
Yang, Z., Ding, K., Pan, L., Deng, M., & Gan, L. (2003) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2003.08.005 · Cited by 270
Zhang, R., Zhang, Z., Zhang, C., Zhang, L., Robin, A., Wang, Y., Lu, M., & Chopp, M. (2004) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1109-04.2004 · Cited by 205
The search for the retinoblastoma cell of origin
Dyer, M. A., & Bremner, R. (2005) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1545 · Cited by 170
Cell birth and death in the mouse retinal ganglion cell layer
Farah, M. H., & Easter, S. S. (2005) · The Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.20615 · Cited by 73
Mallika, C., Guo, Q., & Li, J. Y. H. (2015) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.08.010 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Belliveau, M. J., & Cepko, C. L.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1999-02-01
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 555-566
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2148067219
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.