Cited by 149Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis ApplicationsNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Development-on-chip: in vitro neural tube patterning with a microfluidic device

Open access
Demers, Christopher J., Soundararajan, Prabakaran, Chennampally, Phaneendra, Cox, Gregory A., Briscoe, James, Collins, Scott D., Smith, Rosemary L.·2016·Development

Abstract

Embryogenesis is a highly regulated process in which the precise spatial and temporal release of soluble cues directs differentiation of multipotent stem cells into discrete populations of specialized adult cell types. In the spinal cord, neural progenitor cells are directed to differentiate into adult neurons through the action of mediators released from nearby organizing centers, such as the floor plate and paraxial mesoderm. These signals combine to create spatiotemporal diffusional landscapes that precisely regulate the development of the central nervous system (CNS). Currently, in vivo and ex vivo studies of these signaling factors present some inherent ambiguity. In vitro methods are preferred for their enhanced experimental clarity but often lack the technical sophistication required for biological realism. In this article, we present a versatile microfluidic platform capable of mimicking the spatial and temporal chemical environments found in vivo during neural tube development. Simultaneous opposing and/or orthogonal gradients of developmental morphogens can be maintained, resulting in neural tube patterning analogous to that observed in vivo.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/dev.126847

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Microfluidic systems can create miniaturized niches with precise control over mechano-chemical properties.

    “microfluidic systems can be leveraged to create miniaturized niches with precise control over mechano-chemical properties91.”

    From Organoids (2022) · cites this paper as [91]

    The Results (Microdevice design, fabrication and characterization; page not provided) describe a miniaturized, three-dimensional cell-culture chamber, while the Discussion describes a user-defined chemical concentration landscape. The paper does not show precise control over mechanical properties, so the mechano-chemical part of the claim is only partly supported. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Demers, C. J., Soundararajan, P., Chennampally, P., Cox, G. A., Briscoe, J., Collins, S. D., & Smith, R. L.
Affiliations
  • National Institute for Medical Research (GB)
  • Moffitt Cancer Center (US)
  • University of Maine (US)
  • Jackson Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Collins, Scott D.
Venue
Development
Published
2016-06-01
Volume
143
Issue
11
Pages
1884-1892
ISSN
  • 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9129
OpenAlex
W2411867197
Cited by
149
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Development (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • The Mouseion at the JAXlibrary (Jackson Laboratory) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1145949)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
neural tube patterning, microfluidics, embryonic development, morphogen gradients, floor plate, paraxial mesoderm, neural progenitor cells, spinal cord development, central nervous system development, in vitro development
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Differentiation, Computer Simulation, Equipment Design, Mice, Transgenic, Motor Neurons, Time Factors, Transcription Factors, Body Patterning, Neural Tube, Lab-On-A-Chip Devices, Time-Lapse Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review