The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Animal models for bone tissue engineering and modelling disease
Open accessAbstract
Tissue engineering and its clinical application, regenerative medicine, are instructing multiple approaches to aid in replacing bone loss after defects caused by trauma or cancer. In such cases, bone formation can be guided by engineered biodegradable and nonbiodegradable scaffolds with clearly defined architectural and mechanical properties informed by evidence-based research. With the ever-increasing expansion of bone tissue engineering and the pioneering research conducted to date, preclinical models are becoming a necessity to allow the engineered products to be translated to the clinic. In addition to creating smart bone scaffolds to mitigate bone loss, the field of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine is exploring methods to treat primary and secondary bone malignancies by creating models that mimic the clinical disease manifestation. This Review gives an overview of the preclinical testing in animal models used to evaluate bone regeneration concepts. Immunosuppressed rodent models have shown to be successful in mimicking bone malignancy via the implantation of human-derived cancer cells, whereas large animal models, including pigs, sheep and goats, are being used to provide an insight into bone formation and the effectiveness of scaffolds in induced tibial or femoral defects, providing clinically relevant similarity to human cases. Despite the recent progress, the successful translation of bone regeneration concepts from the bench to the bedside is rooted in the efforts of different research groups to standardise and validate the preclinical models for bone tissue engineering approaches.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
VEGFR1-positive haematopoietic bone marrow progenitors initiate the pre-metastatic niche
Kaplan, R. N., Riba, R. D., Zacharoulis, S., Bramley, A. H., Vincent, L., Costa, C., MacDonald, D. D., Jin, D. K., Shido, K., Kerns, S. A., et al. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04186 · Cited by 3,288
Perren, S. M. (2002) · Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume · doi:10.1302/0301-620x.84b8.13752 · Cited by 1,247
Bone graft materials. An overview of the basic science.
Bauer, T. W., & Muschler, G. F. (2000) · PubMed · Cited by 1,073
The triple origin of skull in higher vertebrates: a study in quail-chick chimeras
Couly, G. F., Coltey, P. M., & Douarin, N. M. L. (1993) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.117.2.409 · Cited by 1,023
Bone Graft Materials: An Overview of the Basic Science
Bauer, T. W., & Muschler, G. F. (2000) · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · doi:10.1097/00003086-200002000-00003 · Cited by 998
Perren, S. M. (2002) · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume · doi:10.1302/0301-620x.84b8.0841093 · Cited by 916
Hematopoietic stem cell niche maintenance during homeostasis and regeneration
Mendelson, A., & Frenette, P. S. (2014) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.3647 · Cited by 792
Kon, E., Muraglia, A., Corsi, A., Bianco, P., Marcacci, M., Martin, I., Boyde, A., Ruspantini, I., Chistolini, P., Rocca, M., et al. (2000) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(20000305)49:3<328::aid-jbm5>3.0.co;2-q · Cited by 721
Blood and bone: two tissues whose fates are intertwined to create the hematopoietic stem-cell niche
Taichman, R. S. (2005) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2004-06-2480 · Cited by 649
The Critical Size Defect as an Experimental Model To Test Bone Repair Materials
Hollinger, J. O., & Kleinschmidt, J. C. (1990) · Journal of Craniofacial Surgery · doi:10.1097/00001665-199001000-00011 · Cited by 625
Cited by
Importance of the pig as a human biomedical model
Lunney, J. K., Van Goor, A., Walker, K. E., Hailstock, T., Franklin, J., & Dai, C. (2021) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.abd5758 · Cited by 801
The Next Frontier in Melt Electrospinning: Taming the Jet
Robinson, T. M., Hutmacher, D. W., & Dalton, P. D. (2019) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201904664 · Cited by 267
Self-citationDesign, printing, and engineering of regenerative biomaterials for personalized bone healthcare
Jia, Z., Xu, X., Zhu, D., & Zheng, Y. (2023) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2023.101072 · Cited by 176
MOFs and bone: application of MOFs in bone tissue engineering and bone diseases
Li, X., Shu, X., Shi, Y., Li, H., & Pei, X. (2023) · Chinese Chemical Letters · doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2022.107986 · Cited by 65
Cao, C., Huang, P., Prasopthum, A., Parsons, A. J., Ai, F., & Yang, J. (2022) · Biomaterials Science · doi:10.1039/d1bm01645h · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- McGovern, J. A., Griffin, M., & Hutmacher, D. W.
- Venue
- Disease Models & Mechanisms
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2018-04-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 1754-8403 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-8411
- OpenAlex
- W2800126426
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 86
- FWCI
- 11.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Animal models for bone tissue engineering and modelling disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/dmm.033084
- The paper
- McGovern, J. A., Griffin, M., & Hutmacher, D. W. (2018). Animal models for bone tissue engineering and modelling disease. Disease Models & Mechanisms. https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.033084
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.