The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cell polarity triggered by cell-cell adhesion via E-cadherin
Open accessAbstract
Cell polarity is orchestrated by numerous extracellular cues, and guides events such as chemotaxis, mitosis and wound healing. In scrape-wound assays of cell monolayers, wound-edge cells orient their centrosomes towards the wound, a process that appears to depend on the formation of new cell–extracellular-matrix adhesions as cells spread into the wound. In direct contrast to scrape-wounded cells, isolated cells without cell-cell contacts failed to polarize, suggesting that asymmetry of cell-cell adhesions resulting from monolayer disruption might contribute to polarization. By using micropatterned substrates to engineer such asymmetries in kidney epithelial cells, we found that cell-cell contact induced displacement of the nucleus towards the contact, and also caused centrosomal reorientation and lamellipodial ruffling to the distal side of the nucleus. Upon release from micropatterned constraints, cells exhibited directed migration away from the cell-cell contact. Disrupting E-cadherin engagement randomized nuclear position and lamellipodial ruffling in patterned cultures, and abrogated scrape-wound-induced cell reorientation, but not migration rate. Polarity that was induced by cell-cell contact required an intact actin cytoskeleton and Cdc42 activity, but not RhoA or Rac signaling. Together, these findings demonstrate a novel role for cell-cell adhesion in polarization, and have implications for wound healing and developmental patterning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cell Migration: A Physically Integrated Molecular Process
Lauffenburger, D. A., & Horwitz, A. F. (1996) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81280-5 · Cited by 3,915
Ehrlich, J. S., Hansen, M. D. H., & Nelson, W. J. (2002) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/s1534-5807(02)00216-2 · Cited by 358
Cited by
Deconstructing the third dimension – how 3D culture microenvironments alter cellular cues
Baker, B. M., & Chen, C. S. (2012) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.079509 · Cited by 1,760
Self-citationAdherens junctions: from molecules to morphogenesis
Harris, T. J. C., & Tepass, U. (2010) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2927 · Cited by 990
Mechanobiology of collective cell behaviours
Ladoux, B., & Mège, R.-M. (2017) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm.2017.98 · Cited by 749
Micropatterning as a tool to decipher cell morphogenesis and functions
Théry, M. (2010) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.075150 · Cited by 730
Weber, G. F., Bjerke, M. A., & DeSimone, D. W. (2012) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2011.10.013 · Cited by 366
Metadata
- Authors
- Desai, R. A., Gao, L., Raghavan, S., Liu, W. F., & Chen, C. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Cell Science
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2009-04-01
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 905-911
- ISSN
- 0021-9533 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9137
- OpenAlex
- W2031484321
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cell polarity triggered by cell-cell adhesion via E-cadherin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jcs.028183
- The paper
- Desai, R. A., Gao, L., Raghavan, S., Liu, W. F., & Chen, C. S. (2009). Cell polarity triggered by cell-cell adhesion via E-cadherin. Journal of Cell Science. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.028183
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.