The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clonal analysis of nestin– vimentin+ multipotent fibroblasts isolated from human dermis
Abstract
Although several studies have shown that dermal fibroblasts possess adipogenic, osteogenic or chondrogenic differentiation potential, no study has characterized this cell population in detail, and there is as yet no evidence that a single dermal fibroblast can differentiate into all these types of cells. In this study, dermal fibroblasts were isolated from human foreskin using a regular dermal fibroblast culture system. These cells could be expended in adherent culture for over 40 cell doublings. In addition, dermal fibroblasts exhibited adipogenic, osteogenic and chondrogenic phenotypes when they were cultured in the presence of certain inducers. Importantly, clonal analysis showed that 6.4% (3/47) of the single-cell-derived clones were tripotent, 19.1% (9/47) of the clones were bipotent, and 10.6% (5/47) of the clones were unipotent. Furthermore, one of the three tested tripotent clones exhibited neurogenic and hepatogenic differentiation potential. Phenotypic analyses showed that the tripotent fibroblasts were nestin– vimentin+, which is different from the dermis-derived stem cells reported by others. These results indicate that dermal fibroblasts are a heterogeneous population containing progenitors with various levels of differentiation potential, and the nestin– vimentin+ fibroblasts may represent a novel type of multipotent adult stem cells in human dermis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Comparison of Multi-Lineage Cells from Human Adipose Tissue and Bone Marrow
De Ugarte, D. A., Morizono, K., Elbarbary, A., Alfonso, Z., Zuk, P. A., Zhu, M., Dragoo, J. L., Ashjian, P., Thomas, B., Benhaim, P., et al. (2003) · Cells Tissues Organs · doi:10.1159/000071150 · Cited by 1,173
Cited by
Single-cell transcriptional diversity is a hallmark of developmental potential
Gulati, G. S., Sikandar, S. S., Wesche, D. J., Manjunath, A., Bharadwaj, A., Berger, M. J., Ilagan, F., Kuo, A. H., Hsieh, R. W., Cai, S., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aax0249 · Cited by 1,571
Concise Review: The Surface Markers and Identity of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells
Lv, F.-J., Tuan, R. S., Cheung, K. M. C., & Leung, V. Y. L. (2014) · Stem Cells · doi:10.1002/stem.1681 · Cited by 984
Single-cell transcriptomes of the human skin reveal age-related loss of fibroblast priming
Solé-Boldo, L., Raddatz, G., Schütz, S., Mallm, J.-P., Rippe, K., Lonsdorf, A. S., Rodríguez-Paredes, M., & Lyko, F. (2020) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-020-0922-4 · Cited by 559
Kretlow, J. D., Jin, Y.-Q., Liu, W., Zhang, W. J., Hong, T.-H., Zhou, G., Baggett, L. S., Mikos, A. G., & Cao, Y. (2008) · BMC Cell Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2121-9-60 · Cited by 466
Self-citationYin, M., Wu, J., Deng, M., Wang, P., Ji, G., Wang, M., Zhou, C., Blum, N. T., Zhang, W., Shi, H., et al. (2021) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.1c06036 · Cited by 380
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, F. G., Zhang, W. J., Bi, D., Liu, W., Wei, X., Chen, F. F., Zhu, L., Cui, L., & Cao, Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Cell Science
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2007-08-15
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 2875-2883
- ISSN
- 0021-9533 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9137
- OpenAlex
- W2123032632
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.