Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 404Cancer-related Molecular PathwaysCell death mechanisms and regulationPI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 96 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 121 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

p53 at a glance

Open access
Brady, Colleen A., Attardi, Laura D.·2010·Journal of Cell Science

Abstract

Since its discovery in 1979, the role of the p53 protein in cancer has been studied intensively (Levine and Oren, 2009). p53 is a crucial tumor suppressor, long-recognized to suppress cancer through the induction of cell-cycle-arrest or apoptosis programs in response to a plethora of different cellular stress signals. Although this model paints a seemingly simple picture, the longer that p53 is studied, the more it confronts researchers with new questions about its functions and mechanisms of action. The tumor-suppressor function of p53 extends beyond the capacity to trigger cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis, and novel activities that impact tumor suppression are perpetually emerging, including the regulation of metabolism, autophagy and the oxidative status of the cell. Moreover, because it acts as a crucial node downstream of diverse stress signals, it is perhaps not surprising that p53 has been recently discovered to have broader roles in physiology and pathology. In this article and its accompanying poster, we outline the basic molecular and cellular functions of p53, describe the intricate network of p53 mediators, and provide insight into the roles of p53 in normal physiology and human disease.Analysis of human cancers reveals a fundamental role for p53 in tumor suppression. More than half of human cancers, of a wide variety of types, harbor p53 (TP53) mutations, and inheritance of a mutant p53 allele predisposes humans to the Li-Fraumeni cancer syndrome (Olivier et al., 2010). Unequivocal confirmation of the crucial role for p53 in tumor suppression was demonstrated by the completely penetrant cancer phenotype of p53-null mice (Kenzelmann Broz and Attardi, 2010). p53 restricts tumor development by serving as a sensor of cellular stress, responding to diverse signals, including DNA damage, hypoxia, oncogene expression, nutrient deprivation and ribosome dysfunction, and limiting the propagation of cells under these adverse conditions (Vousden and Prives, 2009). In metazoans, an ancestral function of p53 is thought to be its ability to trigger programmed cell death (also known as apoptosis) in response to DNA damage, as a measure to preserve the integrity of the germ line (Junttila and Evan, 2009; Lu and Abrams, 2006; Lu et al., 2009). Subsequently, with the evolution of longer-living organisms, p53 is thought to have acquired the ability to respond to oncogenic signals, promoting apoptosis or senescence – a permanent cell-cycle-arrest response – as a safeguard against neoplasia. Thus, in cells exposed to potent stress signals, p53 drives irreversible programs of apoptosis or senescence to cull irreparably damaged or malignant cells, for the ultimate benefit of the organism (Vousden and Prives, 2009). Alternatively, under conditions of low-level stress, p53 elicits protective, pro-survival responses, such as temporary cell-cycle arrest, DNA repair and antioxidant protein production, to maintain genome integrity and viability in cells that sustain limited, reparable damage. These various responses rely on the ability of p53 to function as a transcriptional activator of a panoply of target genes, although transactivation-independent activities ascribed to p53 can also contribute to p53-mediated responses, as highlighted below.Similarly to other transcription factors, p53 has a modular protein domain structure (Joerger and Fersht, 2007; Vousden and Prives, 2009). The N-terminus of p53 comprises two transcriptional activation domains (TADs), TAD1 and TAD2, which span amino acid residues 1-40 and 40-60, respectively. These domains can independently enhance transcription of p53 target genes by recruiting histone-modifying enzymes, components of the basal transcriptional machinery and coactivator complexes, such as STAGA and Mediator (Gamper and Roeder, 2008; Joerger and Fersht, 2007). C-terminal to the transactivation domains, between residues 60-95, lies the proline-rich domain (PRD), which was originally proposed to participate in protein-protein interactions on the basis of the presence of PxxP motifs that resemble Src homology 3 (SH3)-domain-binding regions (Toledo et al., 2006; Toledo et al., 2007). However, a structural function might be the main role of this domain because knock-in mice carrying proline-to-alanine point mutations in the putative protein-protein interaction sites of this domain appear normal, whereas complete domain deletion disrupts p53 tumor-suppressor function. The central core of p53, which spans residues 100-300, comprises the DNA-binding domain that is responsible for sequence-specific binding of the protein to p53 response elements in DNA. Most cancer-associated p53 mutations are missense mutations in this domain and incapacitate DNA binding, illuminating the key importance of DNA binding for p53-mediated tumor suppression. Tumor-derived p53 mutations either alter residues that are essential for direct contact with p53 response elements (contact mutants) or impair proper folding of

Overview

CoChat Summary

TL;DR

This review summarizes p53 as a central stress-sensing tumor suppressor, covering its protein domains, transcriptional and cytoplasmic functions, regulation by MDM2/MDMX, and broader roles in physiology and disease. It emphasizes that p53 outcomes are highly context-dependent and that its biology is more complex than the canonical cell-cycle-arrest/apoptosis model.

Key findings

  • p53 is mutated in more than half of human cancers of many types; inherited mutant p53 predisposes to Li-Fraumeni syndrome, and p53-null mice have a completely penetrant cancer phenotype.
  • p53 has a modular domain structure: TAD1 (residues 1–40), TAD2 (40–60), proline-rich domain (60–95), DNA-binding core (100–300), tetramerization domain (325–356), and C-terminal basic domain (363–393). The six most common cancer hotspot residues are R175, G245, R248, R249, R273 and R282.
  • p53 binds response elements as a tetramer, classically two half sites of RRRCWWGYYY separated by 0–13 bp. Severe stress drives apoptosis or senescence; low-level stress promotes temporary arrest, DNA repair and antioxidant responses. p53 also has cytoplasmic roles in apoptosis and autophagy, metabolic effects, and non-cell-autonomous tumor-suppressive effects.
  • MDM2 and MDMX regulate p53 levels and activity. Mdm2-null mice show very early embryonic lethality that is completely rescued by p53 loss; Mdmx-null mice show p53-dependent embryonic lethality later in embryogenesis. p53 also activates MDM2 transcription, forming a negative-feedback loop.

Methods

  • Narrative review article with an accompanying poster; no primary experimental design, sample or new data are reported.
  • Synthesizes published literature on p53 molecular and cellular functions, its regulators, and its roles in normal physiology and human disease.
  • No systematic review, meta-analysis or quantitative synthesis methods are stated.

Limitations

  • The authors state that capturing the complete complexity of p53 function is beyond the scope of the article; they note omitted topics including post-translational modifications, p53 polymorphisms, p53 isoforms, and p63/p73 family interplay.
  • The text highlights unresolved or controversial areas, including pro-aging versus anti-aging roles of p53 in different mouse models, the dual role of autophagy in tumor suppression, uncertainty about the full importance of the MDMX-MDM2 interaction, complexity of C-terminal lysine modifications, and unknown significance of p53 isoforms.
  • Evident from the text: as a narrative review, it does not provide a systematic search strategy, quantitative synthesis, or primary data, and many conclusions rely on cited reviews and model systems.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/jcs.064501

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 Valid · 0 Not valid · 69 Not checked · 34 Own results and interpretations

58 more claims

Create a free account to see all 103 claims and to verify the 109 references still open.

See all claims — free account
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 33
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 9

Create a free account to see these claims.

Citations

Cites

Show all 96 references

Cited by

See all 404

Metadata

Authors
Brady, C. A., & Attardi, L. D.
Affiliations
Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Attardi, Laura D.
Venue
Journal of Cell Science
Published
2010-08-01
Volume
123
Issue
15
Pages
2527-2532
ISSN
  • 0021-9533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9137
OpenAlex
W2170622332
Cited by
403
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 27
FWCI
2.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cell Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cell death mechanisms and regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
Keywords
p53, tumor suppressor, TP53 mutation, Li-Fraumeni syndrome, cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, cellular stress response, DNA damage, hypoxia, oncogene-induced senescence, autophagy, cellular metabolism, oxidative stress, p53-null mice, cancer susceptibility
MeSH terms
Animals, Autophagy, Cytoplasm, Humans, Neoplasms, Transcriptional Activation, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Apoptosis, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-15, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-15 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: p53 at a glance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jcs.064501
The paper
Brady, C. A., & Attardi, L. D. (2010). p53 at a glance. Journal of Cell Science. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.064501

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.