The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Molecular diversity of cell-matrix adhesions
Abstract
In this study we have examined for molecular heterogeneity of cell-matrix adhesions and the involvement of actomyosin contractility in the selective recruitment of different plaque proteins. For this purpose, we have developed a novel microscopic approach for molecular morphometry, based on automatic identification of matrix adhesions, followed by quantitative immunofluorescence and morphometric analysis. Particularly informative was fluorescence ratio imaging, comparing the local labeling intensities of different plaque molecules, including vinculin, paxillin, tensin and phosphotyrosine-containing proteins. Ratio imaging revealed considerable molecular heterogeneity between and within adhesion sites. Most striking were the differences between focal contacts, which are vinculin- and paxillin-rich and contain high levels of phosphotyrosine, and fibrillar adhesions, which are tensin-rich and contain little or no phosphotyrosine. Ratio imaging also revealed considerable variability in the molecular substructure of individual focal contacts, pointing to a non-uniform distribution of phosphotyrosine and the different plaque constituents. Studying the quantitative relationships between the various components of the submembrane plaque indicated that the levels of vinculin, paxillin and phosphotyrosine in adhesion sites are positively correlated with each other and negatively correlated with the levels of tensin. Tyrosine phosphorylation of focal contacts was highly sensitive to cellular contractility, and was diminished within 5 minutes after treatment with the kinase inhibitor H-7, an inhibitor of actomyosin contractility. This was followed by the loss of paxillin and vinculin from the focal adhesions. Tensin-rich fibrillar adhesions were relatively insensitive to H-7 treatment. These findings suggest a role for contractility in the generation of matrix adhesion diversity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Taking Cell-Matrix Adhesions to the Third Dimension
Cukierman, E., Pankov, R., Stevens, D. R., & Yamada, K. M. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1064829 · Cited by 3,027
Self-citationEpidermal growth factor receptor: Mechanisms of activation and signalling
Jorissen, R. (2003) · Experimental Cell Research · doi:10.1016/s0014-4827(02)00098-8 · Cited by 1,565
Measuring mechanical tension across vinculin reveals regulation of focal adhesion dynamics
Grashoff, C., Hoffman, B. D., Brenner, M. D., Zhou, R., Parsons, M., Yang, M. T., McLean, M. A., Sligar, S. G., Chen, C. S., Ha, T., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09198 · Cited by 1,541
Bacakova, L., Filova, E., Parizek, M., Ruml, T., & Svorcik, V. (2011) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.06.004 · Cited by 1,000
Assembly of Fibronectin Extracellular Matrix
Singh, P., Carraher, C., & Schwarzbauer, J. E. (2010) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100109-104020 · Cited by 960
Metadata
- Authors
- Zamir, E., Katz, B.-Z., Aota, S.-I., Yamada, K. M., Geiger, B., & Kam, Z.
- Venue
- Journal of Cell Science
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1999-06-01
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1655-1669
- ISSN
- 0021-9533 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9137
- OpenAlex
- W2142111204
- Cited by
- 458
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular diversity of cell-matrix adhesions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jcs.112.11.1655
- The paper
- Zamir, E., Katz, B.-Z., Aota, S.-I., Yamada, K. M., Geiger, B., & Kam, Z. (1999). Molecular diversity of cell-matrix adhesions. Journal of Cell Science. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.112.11.1655
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.