The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intestinal stem cells protect their genome by selective segregation of template DNA strands
Open accessAbstract
The stem cells in the crypts of the small intestinal mucosa divide about a thousand times during the lifespan of a laboratory mouse, and yet they show little evidence of any decline in proliferative potential and rarely develop carcinogenic mutations, suggesting that their genome is extremely well protected. Protection against DNA-replication-induced errors can be achieved by the selective sorting of old (template) and new DNA strands with all template strands retained in the stem cell line. The template strands in the stem cells can be labelled during development or during tissue regeneration using tritiated thymidine (3HTdR). Labelling newly synthesised strands with a different marker (bromodeoxyuridine, BrdUrd) allows segregation of the two markers to be studied. Template strand label is retained(3HTdR), whereas label in the newly synthesised strands (BrdUrd) is lost following the second division of the stem cell. Random errors may occur in the template strands owing to environmental elements. These are protected against by the altruistic cell suicide (apoptosis) of the cells incurring such errors. A final level of protection for the tissue compensates for excessive deletion of stem cells via the apoptosis pathway. This is achieved by a hierarchical age structure in the stem cell compartment, with some cells being able to efficiently repair DNA damage and hence being more radioresistant. The presence of these protective mechanisms ensures that the small intestine rarely develops cancer and that stem cells can sustain the extensive cell proliferation needed during life.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cotsarelis, G., Sun, T.-T., & Lavker, R. M. (1990) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(90)90696-c · Cited by 2,276
Slowly cycling (label‐retaining) epidermal cells behave like clonogenic stem cells in vitro
Morris, R. J., & Potten, C. S. (1994) · Cell Proliferation · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2184.1994.tb01425.x · Cited by 207
Self-citation
Cited by
Identification of stem cells in small intestine and colon by marker gene Lgr5
Barker, N., van Es, J. H., Kuipers, J., Kujala, P., van den Born, M., Cozijnsen, M., Haegebarth, A., Korving, J., Begthel, H., Peters, P. J., et al. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06196 · Cited by 5,687
Wnt signalling in stem cells and cancer
Reya, T., & Clevers, H. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03319 · Cited by 3,666
Cancer stem cells: an old idea–a paradigm shift
Wicha, M. S., Liu, S., & Dontu, G. (2006) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-05-3153 · Cited by 1,378
The intestinal crypt, a prototype stem cell compartment
Clevers, H. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.07.004 · Cited by 1,223
Molecular regulation of stem cell quiescence
Cheung, T. H., & Rando, T. A. (2013) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3591 · Cited by 1,148
Metadata
- Authors
- Potten, C. S., Owen, G., & Booth, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Cell Science
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2002-06-01
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2381-2388
- ISSN
- 0021-9533 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9137
- OpenAlex
- W2112364863
- Cited by
- 633
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intestinal stem cells protect their genome by selective segregation of template DNA strands. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jcs.115.11.2381
- The paper
- Potten, C. S., Owen, G., & Booth, D. (2002). Intestinal stem cells protect their genome by selective segregation of template DNA strands. Journal of Cell Science. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.115.11.2381
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.