Cited by 514Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsMicrotubule and mitosis dynamicsGenetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases

Arrangement of subunits in flagellar microtubules

Amos, Linda A., Klug, A.·1974·Journal of Cell Science

Abstract

ABSTRACT Electron micrographs of outer doublet tubules from flagella have been analysed by methods which make use of the computed diffraction patterns of electron-microscope images. Analysis of singlet A-tubules in the tips of flagella has led to a determination of the helical surface lattice of the A-subfibre, confirming that there are 13 longitudinal protofilaments in the tubule wall and that dimers in neighbouring protofilaments form a staggered arrangement, equivalent to the lattice with an axial periodicity of 8 · 0 nm predicted in earlier work. A low-resolution 3-dimensional image of the A-tubule has been reconstructed, which supports the evidence for an 8 · 0-nm-long heterodimer oriented along the protofilaments. The heterodimer is identified as a pair of 4 · 0-nm morphological units, which appear to be globular at this resolution. Filtered images have been obtained from doublet tubules which show that the B-subfibre is also made up of 8 · 0-nm dimers, but it differs from the A-tubule in that dimers in adjacent filaments are not in a staggered arrangement but are lined up obliquely at a shallow angle. Using the additional information about the hands of the lattices in the 2 subfibres which is presented in the accompanying paper, a model for the whole doublet has been proposed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/jcs.14.3.523

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a 13 protofilament microtubule A-lattice, tubulin-tubulin sideways interactions occur between alpha and beta monomers, giving a seamless lattice and Fibonacci geometry that are optimal for quantum computing and preferred in Orch OR.

    “In a 13 protofilament MT A-lattice, tubulin-tubulin sideways interaction occur between alpha monomer on one tubulin, and beta tubulin on the other (alpha-beta, and beta-alpha) [155].This gives a seamless lattice and Fibonacci geometry which are optimal for quantum computing, and preferred in Orch OR.”

    From Consciousness in the universe (2014) · cites this paper as [155]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amos, L. A., & Klug, A.
Affiliations
MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology (GB)
Venue
Journal of Cell Science
Published
1974-05-01
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
523-549
ISSN
  • 0021-9533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9137
OpenAlex
W1881571321
Cited by
514
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 8
FWCI
16.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cell Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases
Keywords
flagellar microtubules, protofilaments, 3D reconstruction, flagellum ultrastructure
MeSH terms
Flagella, Microscopy, Electron, Microtubules, Models, Structural, Periodicity, Proteins, Surface Properties

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review