Cited by 47Genetic and Kidney Cyst DiseasesAdvanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics

α- and β-Tubulin Lattice of the Axonemal Microtubule Doublet and Binding Proteins Revealed by Single Particle Cryo-Electron Microscopy and Tomography

Open access
Maheshwari, Aditi, Obbineni, Jagan Mohan, Bui, Khanh Huy, Shibata, Keitaro, Toyoshima, Yoko Y., Ishikawa, Takashi·2015·Structure

Abstract

Microtubule doublet (MTD) is the main skeleton of cilia/flagella. Many proteins, such as dyneins and radial spokes, bind to MTD, and generate or regulate force. While the structure of the reconstituted microtubule has been solved at atomic resolution, nature of the axonemal MTD is still unclear. There are a few hypotheses of the lattice arrangement of its α- and β-tubulins, but it has not been described how dyneins and radial spokes bind to MTD. In this study, we analyzed the three-dimensional structure of Tetrahymena MTD at ∼19 Å resolution by single particle cryo-electron microscopy. To identify α- and β-tubulins, we combined image analysis of MTD with specific kinesin decoration. This work reveals that α- and β-tubulins form a B-lattice arrangement in the entire MTD with a seam at the outer junction. We revealed the unique way in which inner arm dyneins, radial spokes, and proteins inside MTD bind and bridge protofilaments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.str.2015.06.017

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The inner junction is well positioned to act as a scaffold for the radial spoke and dynein regulatory complex machinery.

    “Based on near-atomic-resolution cryo-electron microscopy reconstructions of motile cilia axonemes, the inner junction is well positioned to act as a scaffold for the radial spoke and dynein regulatory complex machinery19–22.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maheshwari, A., Obbineni, J. M., Bui, K. H., Shibata, K., Toyoshima, Y. Y., & Ishikawa, T.
Affiliations
  • Paul Scherrer Institute (CH)
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
Corresponding author
Ishikawa, Takashi
Venue
Structure
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
23
Issue
9
Pages
1584-1595
ISSN
0969-2126 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2150759583
Cited by
47
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5
FWCI
4.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Structure (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DORA PSI (Paul Scherrer Institute) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (25650048)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
Keywords
alpha-tubulin, beta-tubulin, radial spokes, cilia, flagella, Tetrahymena, microtubule-binding protein
MeSH terms
Binding Sites, Cilia, Cytoskeletal Proteins, Models, Molecular, Protein Binding, Tubulin, Protozoan Proteins, Kinesins, Tetrahymena thermophila, Crystallography, X-Ray, Cryoelectron Microscopy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review