The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cell to substratum contacts of chick fibroblasts and their relation to the microfilament system. a correlated interference-reflexion and high-voltage electron-microscope study
Abstract
The interference reflexion microscope may be used to examine the pattern of cell-substratum separation of cultured cells. Earlier studies on chick fibroblasts using this technique identified 3 types of separation: (1) focal contacts, representing approx. 10—14 nm separation and which are sites of cell-substratum adhesion and form at the leading edge of a cell during locomotion; (2) close contacts, representing approx. 30 nm separation; and (3) regions of greater separation, generally 100 – 140 nm. Using light microscopy these studies described the association of the focal contacts with the distal ends of cytoplasmic fibres and noted their similarity to the adhesion plaques described in EM studies of thin vertical sections of fibroblasts. In this investigation we have directly confirmed these earlier observations by using a correlated interference-reflexion and high-voltage stereo electron-microscopic study of cultured chick heart fibroblasts. The results show that focal contacts are always associated with the distal ends of linear bundles of microfilaments which pass centripetally and often obliquely through the cytoplasm. At their proximal ends the bundles insert into a loose matrix of microfilaments and organelles surrounding the nucleus. The close contacts are often associated with a meshwork of microfilaments. The evidence supports the hypothesis that the microfilament bundles of a fibroblast form synchronously with the focal adhesions to the substratum. Our results are discussed with reference to the current evidence for the role of contractile proteins in cell locomotion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Presence of modified fibroblasts in granulation tissue and their possible role in wound contraction
Gabbiani, G., Ryan, G. B., & Majno, G. (1971) · Experientia · doi:10.1007/bf02147594 · Cited by 1,485
Cited by
Flow-mediated endothelial mechanotransduction
Davies, P. F. (1995) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1995.75.3.519 · Cited by 2,802
Focal Adhesions: Transmembrane Junctions Between the Extracellular Matrix and the Cytoskeleton
Burridge, K., Fath, K., Kelly, T., Nuckolls, G., & Turner, C. (1988) · Annual Review of Cell Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.cb.04.110188.002415 · Cited by 2,120
Adhesion-Dependent Cell Mechanosensitivity
Bershadsky, A. D., Balaban, N. Q., & Geiger, B. (2003) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.19.111301.153011 · Cited by 874
Appreciating force and shape—the rise of mechanotransduction in cell biology
Iskratsch, T., Wolfenson, H., & Sheetz, M. P. (2014) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3903 · Cited by 798
Adhesion and cytoskeletal organisation of fibroblasts in response to fibronectin fragments.
Woods, A., Couchman, J. R., Johansson, S., & Höök, M. (1986) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04265.x · Cited by 431
Metadata
- Authors
- Heath, J. P., & Dunn, G. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Cell Science
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1978-02-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 197-212
- ISSN
- 0021-9533 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9137
- OpenAlex
- W2228492167
- Cited by
- 415
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cell to substratum contacts of chick fibroblasts and their relation to the microfilament system. a correlated interference-reflexion and high-voltage electron-microscope study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jcs.29.1.197
- The paper
- Heath, J. P., & Dunn, G. A. (1978). Cell to substratum contacts of chick fibroblasts and their relation to the microfilament system. a correlated interference-reflexion and high-voltage electron-microscope study. Journal of Cell Science. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.29.1.197
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.