The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Formation of cell-to-substrate contacts during fibroblast motility: An interference-reflexion study
Abstract
The formation of close contacts and focal contacts (co. 30 nm and 10–15 nm separation distance respectively) has been studied during the movement of chick heart fibroblasts on planar substrates using interference-reflexion microscopy, and evaluated in the context of spreading and net movement. During spreading the overall advance of the margin of the close contact is steady, punctuated by periods in which it remains stationary, and only 5% of the time is spent withdrawing in contrast to the extreme leading edge. The close contact advances only where a lamellipodium has first extended free of the substrate (⩾100 nm separation distance) ahead of the existing close contact. The new close contact is formed by the lamellipodium lowering to the substrate either progressively from its base forward or distally in patches which later join with the main close contact. New focal contacts are formed successively ahead of existing ones, either by microspikes or lamellipodia contacting the substrate locally ahead of the close contact, or within the close contact usually immediately, but not more than 1–2 μm, behind its margin. Examining the cell margin alternately with interference-reflexion and differentialinterference contrast showed that the formation of the focal contact was preceded in 90% of the cases by the development of a linear structure in the form of a microspike (as expected), a short projection (<2 μm long) of the lamellipodium, or a fibre within the lamellipodium, each of which could be traced to the cytoplasmic fibre typically associated with the focal contact. Stress fibres subsequently developed centripetally from these initial fibres. The different forms of the linear structure which preceded the focal contact were interchangeable, giving rise to one another, and we have evaluated that the structure common to each is probably a short bundle of microfilaments. The following features indicate that the close contact plays a primary role in marginal spreading: it is lost when spreading ceases; it is reformed when spreading resumes but only under the newly spread area; the advance of the margin of the thicker leading lamella closely follows that of the close contact; the advance of both can occur ahead of and is thus independent of existing focal contacts and associated stress fibres. We propose that the close contact provides the adhesion required to transmit to the substrate the forces involved in the forward movement of the marginal cytoplasm. The continual formation of focal contacts and stress fibres at the margin is consistent with their role, suggested by others, in drawing the bulk of the cell forward. These evaluations are discussed in the context of the form and distribution of contractile proteins in the cell margin. A primary role of the lamellipodia and microspikes in extending the cell margin and forming new adhesions, preparatory to further cytoplasmic movement, is established by this work.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The locomotion of fibroblasts in culture
Abercrombie, M., Heaysman, J. E. M., & Pegrum, S. M. (1971) · Experimental Cell Research · doi:10.1016/0014-4827(71)90420-4 · Cited by 965
Actin Antibody: The Specific Visualization of Actin Filaments in Non-Muscle Cells
Lazarides, E., & Weber, K. (1974) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.71.6.2268 · Cited by 723
Izzard, C. S., & Lochner, L. R. (1976) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.21.1.129 · Cited by 705
Self-citationLash, J. W., & Burger, M. M. (1977) · Raven Press eBooks · Cited by 448
Heath, J. P., & Dunn, G. A. (1978) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.29.1.197 · Cited by 415
The locomotion of fibroblasts in culture I. Movements of the leading edge
Abercrombie, M., Heaysman, J. E. M., & Pegrum, S. M. (1970) · Experimental Cell Research · doi:10.1016/0014-4827(70)90646-4 · Cited by 402
Abercrombie, M., & Dunn, G. A. (1975) · Experimental Cell Research · doi:10.1016/0014-4827(75)90636-9 · Cited by 324
The locomotion of fibroblasts in culture
Abercrombie, M., Joan, E., Heaysman, M., & Pegrum, S. M. (1970) · Experimental Cell Research · doi:10.1016/0014-4827(70)90537-9 · Cited by 310
Antibody to Myosin: The Specific Visualization of Myosin-Containing Filaments in Nonmuscle Cells
Weber, K., & Groeschel-Stewart, U. (1974) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.71.11.4561 · Cited by 302
Polarity of actin at the leading edge of cultured cells
SMALL, J. V., ISENBERG, G., & CELIS, J. E. (1978) · Nature · doi:10.1038/272638a0 · Cited by 273
Cited by
Cell Migration: A Physically Integrated Molecular Process
Lauffenburger, D. A., & Horwitz, A. F. (1996) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81280-5 · Cited by 3,915
Flow-mediated endothelial mechanotransduction
Davies, P. F. (1995) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1995.75.3.519 · Cited by 2,802
Burridge, K., Turner, C. E., & Romer, L. H. (1992) · The Journal of cell biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.119.4.893 · Cited by 1,310
Gilmore, A. P., & Romer, L. H. (1996) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.7.8.1209 · Cited by 513
Dugina, V., Fontao, L., Chaponnier, C., Vasiliev, J., & Gabbiani, G. (2001) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.114.18.3285 · Cited by 314
Metadata
- Authors
- Izzard, C. S., & Lochner, L. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Cell Science
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1980-04-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 81-116
- ISSN
- 0021-9533 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9137
- OpenAlex
- W2307166328
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 8.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Formation of cell-to-substrate contacts during fibroblast motility: An interference-reflexion study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jcs.42.1.81
- The paper
- Izzard, C. S., & Lochner, L. R. (1980). Formation of cell-to-substrate contacts during fibroblast motility: An interference-reflexion study. Journal of Cell Science. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.42.1.81
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.