The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dragonfly flight: free-flight and tethered flow visualizations reveal a diverse array of unsteady lift-generating mechanisms, controlled primarily via angle of attack
Abstract
SUMMARY: Here we show, by qualitative free- and tethered-flight flow visualization,that dragonflies fly by using unsteady aerodynamic mechanisms to generate high-lift, leading-edge vortices. In normal free flight, dragonflies use counterstroking kinematics, with a leading-edge vortex (LEV) on the forewing downstroke, attached flow on the forewing upstroke, and attached flow on the hindwing throughout. Accelerating dragonflies switch to in-phase wing-beats with highly separated downstroke flows, with a single LEV attached across both the fore- and hindwings. We use smoke visualizations to distinguish between the three simplest local analytical solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations yielding flow separation resulting in a LEV. The LEV is an open U-shaped separation, continuous across the thorax, running parallel to the wing leading edge and inflecting at the tips to form wingtip vortices. Air spirals in to a free-slip critical point over the centreline as the LEV grows. Spanwise flow is not a dominant feature of the flow field – spanwise flows sometimes run from wingtip to centreline, or vice versa –depending on the degree of sideslip. LEV formation always coincides with rapid increases in angle of attack, and the smoke visualizations clearly show the formation of LEVs whenever a rapid increase in angle of attack occurs. There is no discrete starting vortex. Instead, a shear layer forms behind the trailing edge whenever the wing is at a non-zero angle of attack, and rolls up, under Kelvin–Helmholtz instability, into a series of transverse vortices with circulation of opposite sign to the circulation around the wing and LEV. The flow fields produced by dragonflies differ qualitatively from those published for mechanical models of dragonflies, fruitflies and hawkmoths, which preclude natural wing interactions. However, controlled parametric experiments show that, provided the Strouhal number is appropriate and the natural interaction between left and right wings can occur, even a simple plunging plate can reproduce the detailed features of the flow seen in dragonflies. In our models, and in dragonflies, it appears that stability of the LEV is achieved by a general mechanism whereby flapping kinematics are configured so that a LEV would be expected to form naturally over the wing and remain attached for the duration of the stroke. However, the actual formation and shedding of the LEV is controlled by wing angle of attack, which dragonflies can vary through both extremes, from zero up to a range that leads to immediate flow separation at any time during a wing stroke.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wing Rotation and the Aerodynamic Basis of Insect Flight
Dickinson, M. H., Lehmann, F.-O., & Sane, S. P. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5422.1954 · Cited by 2,645
Katz, J., & Plotkin, A. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511810329 · Cited by 2,263
A general classification of three-dimensional flow fields
Chong, M. S., Perry, A. E., & Cantwell, B. J. (1990) · Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics · doi:10.1063/1.857730 · Cited by 1,891
Leading-edge vortices in insect flight
Ellington, C. P., van den Berg, C., Willmott, A. P., & Thomas, A. L. R. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/384626a0 · Cited by 1,750
Self-citationVan Dyke, M., & Widnall, S. (1983) · Journal of Applied Mechanics · doi:10.1115/1.3167071 · Cited by 1,655
Oscillating foils of high propulsive efficiency
ANDERSON, J. M., STREITLIEN, K., BARRETT, D. S., & TRIANTAFYLLOU, M. S. (1998) · Journal of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1017/s0022112097008392 · Cited by 1,291
Flying and swimming animals cruise at a Strouhal number tuned for high power efficiency
Taylor, G. K., Nudds, R. L., & Thomas, A. L. R. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02000 · Cited by 994
Optimal Thrust Development in Oscillating Foils with Application to Fish Propulsion
Triantafyllou, G. S., Triantafyllou, M. S., & Grosenbaugh, M. A. (1993) · Journal of Fluids and Structures · doi:10.1006/jfls.1993.1012 · Cited by 877
A Description of Eddying Motions and Flow Patterns Using Critical-Point Concepts
Perry, A. E., & Chong, M. S. (1987) · Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1146/annurev.fl.19.010187.001013 · Cited by 777
The aerodynamic effects of wing rotation and a revised quasi-steady model of flapping flight
Sane, S. P., & Dickinson, M. H. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.205.8.1087 · Cited by 775
Cited by
Recent progress in flapping wing aerodynamics and aeroelasticity
Shyy, W., Aono, H., Chimakurthi, S. K., Trizila, P., Kang, C.-K., Cesnik, C. E. S., & Liu, H. (2010) · Progress in Aerospace Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2010.01.001 · Cited by 986
Metadata
- Authors
- Thomas, A. L. R., Taylor, G. K., Srygley, R. B., Nudds, R. L., & Bomphrey, R. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Biology
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2004-11-15
- Volume
- 207
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 4299-4323
- ISSN
- 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9145
- OpenAlex
- W2034351939
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 11.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dragonfly flight: free-flight and tethered flow visualizations reveal a diverse array of unsteady lift-generating mechanisms, controlled primarily via angle of attack. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jeb.01262
- The paper
- Thomas, A. L. R., Taylor, G. K., Srygley, R. B., Nudds, R. L., & Bomphrey, R. J. (2004). Dragonfly flight: free-flight and tethered flow visualizations reveal a diverse array of unsteady lift-generating mechanisms, controlled primarily via angle of attack. Journal of Experimental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.01262
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.