The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How the owl tracks its prey – II
Abstract
Summary: Barn owls can capture prey in pitch darkness or by diving into snow, while homing in on the sounds made by their prey. First, the neural mechanisms by which the barn owl localizes a single sound source in an otherwise quiet environment will be explained. The ideas developed for the single source case will then be expanded to environments in which there are multiple sound sources and echoes – environments that are challenging for humans with impaired hearing. Recent controversies regarding the mechanisms of sound localization will be discussed. Finally, the case in which both visual and auditory information are available to the owl will be considered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“On the contrary, pinna asymmetry may even improve sound localization, as seen in some birds (Norberg, 1977;Takahashi, 2010).”
From An investigation of matching symmetry in the human pinnae with possible implications for 3D ear recognition and sound localization (2015) · cites this paper as Takahashi, 2010
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Spatial hearing: the psychophysics of human sound localization
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-0346 · Cited by 2,304
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-4365 · Cited by 1,882
A place theory of sound localization.
Jeffress, L. A. (1948) · Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0061495 · Cited by 1,480
Goldberg, J. M., & Brown, P. B. (1969) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1969.32.4.613 · Cited by 1,469
XII. On our perception of sound direction
Rayleigh, L. (1907) · The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science · doi:10.1080/14786440709463595 · Cited by 860
A circuit for detection of interaural time differences in the brain stem of the barn owl
Carr, C., & Konishi, M. (1990) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.10-10-03227.1990 · Cited by 817
Litovsky, R. Y., Colburn, H. S., Yost, W. A., & Guzman, S. J. (1999) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.427914 · Cited by 756
Interaural time sensitivity in medial superior olive of cat
Yin, T. C., & Chan, J. C. (1990) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1990.64.2.465 · Cited by 729
DIVISION OF PSYCHOLOGY : STATISTICAL FACILITATION OF SIMPLE REACTION TIMES*
Raab, D. H. (1962) · Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.2164-0947.1962.tb01433.x · Cited by 668
The Precedence Effect in Sound Localization
Wallach, H., Newman, E. B., & Rosenzweig, M. R. (1949) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1418275 · Cited by 614
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Blauert, 1997, Spatial Hearing
- Egnor, 2000, The Role of Spectral Cues in Sound Localization by The Barn Owl
- Mazer, 1995, Integration of parallel processing streams in the inferior colliculus of the owl
- Payne, 1958, Tyto alba Part II, Nat. Hist., 67, 316
Cited by
Claes, P., Reijniers, J., Shriver, M. D., Snyders, J., Suetens, P., Nielandt, J., De Tré, G., & Vandermeulen, D. (2015) · Journal of Anatomy · doi:10.1111/joa.12252 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Takahashi, T. T.
- Affiliations
- Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Biology
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2010-10-15
- Volume
- 213
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 3399-3408
- ISSN
- 1477-9145
- 0022-0949
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 84
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
