Cited by 668Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesPsychology Research and BibliometricsAcademic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology

DIVISION OF PSYCHOLOGY : STATISTICAL FACILITATION OF SIMPLE REACTION TIMES*

Raab, David H.·1962·Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.2164-0947.1962.tb01433.x

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An observer given two information sources rather than one can make speed gains by preferentially responding on the basis of the first available source on each trial.

    “An observer given two information sources rather than one can make speed gains by preferentially responding on the basis of the first available source on each trial, as the average time of winners of races is shorter than the average time of any single contestant (21).”

    From Fusion of visual cues is not mandatory in children (2010) · cites this paper as [21]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raab, D. H.
Affiliations
Brooklyn College (US)
Corresponding author
Raab, David H.
Venue
Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1962-03
Volume
24
Issue
5 Series II
Pages
574-590
ISSN
  • 0028-7113 (ISSN-L)
  • 2164-0947
OpenAlex
W2090237013
Cited by
668
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 24
FWCI
0.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
Keywords
reaction time, statistical analysis, reaction time measurement, psychophysics
MeSH terms
Humans, Reaction Time, Statistics as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review