The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unsteady aerodynamic force generation by a model fruit fly wing in flapping motion
Abstract
SUMMARY: A computational fluid-dynamic analysis was conducted to study the unsteady aerodynamics of a model fruit fly wing. The wing performs an idealized flapping motion that emulates the wing motion of a fruit fly in normal hovering flight. The Navier–Stokes equations are solved numerically. The solution provides the flow and pressure fields, from which the aerodynamic forces and vorticity wake structure are obtained. Insights into the unsteady aerodynamic force generation process are gained from the force and flow-structure information. Considerable lift can be produced when the majority of the wing rotation is conducted near the end of a stroke or wing rotation precedes stroke reversal (rotation advanced), and the mean lift coefficient can be more than twice the quasi-steady value. Three mechanisms are responsible for the large lift: the rapid acceleration of the wing at the beginning of a stroke, the absence of stall during the stroke and the fast pitching-up rotation of the wing near the end of the stroke. When half the wing rotation is conducted near the end of a stroke and half at the beginning of the next stroke (symmetrical rotation), the lift at the beginning and near the end of a stroke becomes smaller because the effects of the first and third mechanisms above are reduced. The mean lift coefficient is smaller than that of the rotation-advanced case, but is still 80 % larger than the quasi-steady value. When the majority of the rotation is delayed until the beginning of the next stroke (rotation delayed), the lift at the beginning and near the end of a stroke becomes very small or even negative because the effect of the first mechanism above is cancelled and the third mechanism does not apply in this case. The mean lift coefficient is much smaller than in the other two cases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wing Rotation and the Aerodynamic Basis of Insect Flight
Dickinson, M. H., Lehmann, F.-O., & Sane, S. P. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5422.1954 · Cited by 2,645
Leading-edge vortices in insect flight
Ellington, C. P., van den Berg, C., Willmott, A. P., & Thomas, A. L. R. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/384626a0 · Cited by 1,750
Weis-Fogh, T. (1973) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.59.1.169 · Cited by 1,371
The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. III. Kinematics
Ellington, C. P. (1984) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1984.0051 · Cited by 811
The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. I. The quasi-steady analysis
Ellington, C. P. (1984) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1984.0049 · Cited by 671
Unsteady Aerodynamic Performance of Model Wings at Low Reynolds Numbers
Dickinson, M. H., & Götz, K. G. (1993) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.174.1.45 · Cited by 668
A Computational Fluid Dynamic Study of Hawkmoth Hovering
Liu, H., Ellington, C. P., Kawachi, K., Van Den Berg, C., & Willmott, A. P. (1998) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.201.4.461 · Cited by 471
Steady and unsteady solutions of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations
Rogers, S. E., Kwak, D., & Kiris, C. C. (1991) · AIAA Journal · doi:10.2514/3.10627 · Cited by 447
The Effects of Wing Rotation on Unsteady Aerodynamic Performance At Low Reynolds Numbers
Dickinson, M. H. (1994) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.192.1.179 · Cited by 244
Vogel, S. (1967) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.46.3.431 · Cited by 103
Cited by
The aerodynamics of insect flight
Sane, S. P. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.00663 · Cited by 1,253
Recent progress in flapping wing aerodynamics and aeroelasticity
Shyy, W., Aono, H., Chimakurthi, S. K., Trizila, P., Kang, C.-K., Cesnik, C. E. S., & Liu, H. (2010) · Progress in Aerospace Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2010.01.001 · Cited by 986
Review of Experimental Work in Biomimetic Foils
Triantafyllou, M. S., Techet, A. H., & Hover, F. S. (2004) · IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering · doi:10.1109/joe.2004.833216 · Cited by 448
Dynamic flight stability of a hovering bumblebee
Sun, M., & Xiong, Y. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.01407 · Cited by 295
Self-citationCombes, S. A., & Daniel, T. L. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.00502 · Cited by 277
Metadata
- Authors
- Sun, M., & Tang, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Biology
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2002-01-01
- Volume
- 205
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 55-70
- ISSN
- 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9145
- OpenAlex
- W2121822682
- Cited by
- 566
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 29.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unsteady aerodynamic force generation by a model fruit fly wing in flapping motion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jeb.205.1.55
- The paper
- Sun, M., & Tang, J. (2002). Unsteady aerodynamic force generation by a model fruit fly wing in flapping motion. Journal of Experimental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.205.1.55
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.