Cited by 140CO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionElectrochemical Analysis and Applications

Electrolytic Reduction of Carbon Dioxide at Mercury Electrode in Aqueous Solution

Hori, Yoshio, Suzuki, Shin·1982·Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan

Abstract

Cathodic reduction of carbon dioxide at a mercury pool electrode was investigated in aqueous solutions of NaHCO3, NaH2PO4–Na2HPO4, NaCl, NaClO4, Na2SO4, LiHCO3, and KHCO3 as well as their combinations. The reaction product was confirmed to be HCOO− by a qualitative spot test. HCOO− was quantitatively analyzed by a permanganate titration. The partial current densities of HCOO− formation (ic) and H2 evolution (iH) were calculated. In the present paper, relationships between electrode behavior and solution properties, some of which have been qualitatively described in previous papers, are quantitatively clarified as follows. The electrode potential Ec for constant ic (0.5 mA/cm2) remains constant irrespective of pH and anions in the pH region of 2.4 to 7.8, whereas the potential EH for constant iH (0.5 mA/cm2) varies linearly with a slope of 125 mV/pH. The present experimental results verify Eyring et al.’s presumption that in a relatively high overvoltage region (region 2) the cathodic reduction of CO2 at Hg proceeds with the charge transfer to CO2 as the rate determining step. CO2 reduction and H2 evolution are concluded to proceed independently at the Hg electrode. The dependence of Ec on electrolyte concentration is interpreted in terms of the diffuse double layer theory. The effect of cation species on Ec also is discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1246/bcsj.55.660

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hori, Y., & Suzuki, S.
Affiliations
Chiba University (JP)
Venue
Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan
Published
1982-03-01
Volume
55
Issue
3
Pages
660-665
ISSN
  • 0009-2673 (ISSN-L)
  • 1348-0634
OpenAlex
W2082327469
Cited by
140
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Electrochemistry › Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
Keywords
electrochemical CO2 reduction, mercury electrode, formate formation, hydrogen evolution reaction, electrode potential, pH dependence, anion effects, electrolyte concentration, diffuse double layer, cation effects, rate-determining step, sodium bicarbonate, sodium phosphate, sodium perchlorate, sodium sulfate, potassium bicarbonate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review