Cited by 196Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalBamboo properties and applicationsIndoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure

Science of bamboo charcoal: study on carbonizing temperature of bamboo charcoal and removal capability of harmful gases

Open access
Asada, Takashi, Ishihara, Shigehisa, Yamane, Takeshi, Toba, Akemi, Yamada, Akifumi, Oikawa, Kikuo·2002·Journal of Health Science

Abstract

We examined the relationship between the carbonizing temperature of bamboo carbide made from Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens) and the removal effect of harmful gases and odorants, and the use of a bamboo charcoal as a countermeasure for “Sick Building Syndrome” or “Chemical Sensitivity” and the use as a deodorant. With regard to the carbonizing temperature of the bamboo charcoal, a temperature sensor was installed inside each bamboo material and the carbonizing temperature was controlled at 500, 700 and 1000°C. The removal effect was tested for formaldehyde, toluene and benzene that are known to cause “Sick Building Syndrome” or “Chemical Sensitivity” and for ammonia, indole, skatole and nonenal as odorants. The formaldehyde removal effect was only slightly different in the charcoal at all the carbonizing temperatures. The benzene, toluene, indole, skatole and nonenal removal effect were the highest for the bamboo charcoal carbonized at 1000°C and tended to increase as the carbonizing temperature of the bamboo charcoal increased. The removal effect for ammonia was the highest on the bamboo charcoal carbonized at 500°C. It is concluded that the effective carbonizing temperature is different for each chemical, and a charcoal must be specifically selected for use as an adsorbent or deodorant.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1248/jhs.48.473

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Asada, T., Ishihara, S., Yamane, T., Toba, A., Yamada, A., & Oikawa, K.
Affiliations
  • Niigata University of Pharmacy and Medical and Life Sciences (JP)
  • Kyoto University (JP)
  • Kankyo Techno Consul
  • Obama Bamboo Charcoal Product Association
  • Nagaoka University of Technology (JP)
Venue
Journal of Health Science
Published
2002
Volume
48
Issue
6
Pages
473-479
ISSN
  • 0013-273X (ISSN-L)
  • 1344-9702
  • 1347-5207
OpenAlex
W2146124004
Cited by
196
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 11
FWCI
4.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Eisei kagaku (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Bamboo properties and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
Keywords
bamboo charcoal, Phyllostachys edulis, formaldehyde removal, benzene removal, toluene removal, ammonia removal, odorant removal, sick building syndrome, chemosensitivity, deodorants, adsorbents, indoor air pollution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review