Cited by 480Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalPhosphorus and nutrient managementSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics

The sorption and desorption of phosphate-P, ammonium-N and nitrate-N in cacao shell and corn cob biochars

Hale, S.E., Alling, V., Martinsen, V., Mulder, J., Breedveld, G.D., Cornelissen, G.·2013·Chemosphere

Abstract

The sorption of PO4-P, NH4-N and NO3-N to cacao shell and corn cob biochars produced at 300-350°C was quantified. The biochars were used; (i) as received (unwashed), (ii) after rinsing with Millipore water and (iii) following leaching with Millipore water. In addition to sorption, desorption of PO4-P from the unwashed biochars was quantified. There was no sorption of PO4-P to either washed or rinsed biochars, but following leaching, both biochars adsorbed PO4-P and distribution coefficients (Kd L kg(-1)) were very similar for both materials (10(1.1±0.5) for cacao shell biochar and 10(1.0±0.2) for corn cob biochar). The BET surface area and micropore volume increased 80% and 60% for the cacao shell and corn cob biochars following leaching. After 60 d, 1483±45 mg kg(-1) and 172±1 mg kg(-1) PO4-P was released from the cacao shell and corn cob biochars. NH4-N was sorbed by both unwashed biochars, albeit weakly with Kd values around 10(2) L kg(-1). We speculate that NH4-N could bind via an electrostatic exchange with other cationic species on the surface of the biochar. There was no significant release or sorption of NO3-N from or to either of the biochars.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.12.057

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hale, S. E., Alling, V., Martinsen, V., Mulder, J., Breedveld, G. D., & Cornelissen, G.
Affiliations
  • Norwegian Geotechnical Institute (NO)
  • Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NO)
Corresponding author
Hale, S.E.
Venue
Chemosphere
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-06
Volume
91
Issue
11
Pages
1612-1619
ISSN
0045-6535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2063243193
Cited by
480
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 5
FWCI
21.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chemosphere (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Phosphorus and nutrient management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Keywords
biochar, corn cob, phosphate adsorption, ammonium sorption, nitrate sorption, phosphate desorption, distribution coefficient, leaching, biochar surface area, nutrient retention
MeSH terms
Absorption, Cacao, Charcoal, Chemistry Techniques, Analytical, Zea mays, Environmental Monitoring, Ferric Compounds, Fertilizers, Indonesia, Nitrates, Phosphates, Soil, Species Specificity, Zambia, Ammonium Compounds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review