Cited by 168Cardiovascular and exercise physiologySports Performance and TrainingHypothalamic control of reproductive hormones

Effects of menstrual phase and amenorrhea on exercise performance in runners

DE SOUZA, MARY JANE, MAGUIRE, MOLLY S., RUBIN, KAREN R., MARESH, CARL M.·1990·Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

Abstract

There are few well controlled studies in terms of subject selection, menstrual classification, and exercise protocol that have examined both maximal and submaximal exercise responses during different phases of the menstrual cycle in eumenorrheic runners and compared these runners to amenorrheic runners. Thus, the purpose of this study was to measure selected physiological and metabolic responses to maximal and submaximal exercise during two phases of the menstrual cycle in eumenorrheic runners and amenorrheic runners. Eight eumenorrheic runners (29.0 +/- 4.2 yr) and eight amenorrheic runners (24.5 +/- 5.7 yr) matched for physical, gynecological, and training characteristics were studied. The eumenorrheic runners performed one maximal and one submaximal (40 min at 80% VO2max) treadmill run during both the early follicular (days 2-4) and midluteal (6-8 d from LH surge) phases. The amenorrheic runners performed one maximal and one submaximal (40 min at 80% VO2max) treadmill run. Cycle phases were documented by urinary luteinizing hormone and progesterone assays and by plasma estradiol and progesterone assays. No differences were observed in oxygen uptake, minute ventilation, heart rate, respiratory exchange ratio, rating of perceived exertion, time to fatigue (maximal), and plasma lactate (following the maximal and submaximal exercise tests) between the follicular and luteal phases in the eumenorrheic runners and the amenorrheic runners. We conclude that neither menstrual phase (follicular vs luteal) nor menstrual status (eumenorrheic vs amenorrheic) alters or limits exercise performance in female athletes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1249/00005768-199010000-00006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DE SOUZA, M. J., MAGUIRE, M. S., RUBIN, K. R., & MARESH, C. M.
Affiliations
University of Connecticut (US)
Venue
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
1990-10
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
575-580
ISSN
0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2068805531
Cited by
168
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
Keywords
menstrual cycle, amenorrhea, exercise performance, female runners, eumenorrhea, follicular phase, luteal phase, maximal exercise, submaximal exercise, oxygen consumption, plasma lactate, female athletes, hormonal status
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Amenorrhea, Energy Metabolism, Exercise Test, Female, Follicular Phase, Heart Rate, Humans, Lactates, Luteal Phase, Menstrual Cycle, Oxygen, Respiration, Running, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review