Cited by 47Thermoregulation and physiological responsesMuscle metabolism and nutritionCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Carbohydrate and fluid ingestion during exercise: are there trade-offs?

COYLE, EDWARD F., MONTAIN, SCOTT J.·1992·Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

Abstract

Intense exercise (i.e.; above 60% VO2max) can be maintained for prolonged periods provided sufficient carbohydrate is available for energy and the heat generated from muscle metabolism does not cause excessive hyperthermia and/or dehydration due to sweating. It is clear that people should ingest carbohydrate during prolonged exercise (i.e.; longer than 1–2 h), which causes fatigue because of an inadequate supply of blood glucose and that fluids should also be ingested in an attempt to offset dehydration and reduce hyperthermia. Ingestion of approximately 30–60 g of carbohydrate (i.e.; glucose, sucrose, or starch) during each hour of exercise will generally be sufficient to maintain blood glucose oxidation late in exercise and delay fatigue. Since the average rates of gastric emptying and intestinal absorption can reach 1 l·h-1 for water and solutions containing up to 8% carbohydrate, exercising people can be supplemented with both carbohydrate and fluids at relatively high rates (over 60 g·h-1 of carbohydrate and 1 l·h-1 of fluid). Therefore, when sweat rate is not high (i.e.; less than 1 l·h-1), the addition of carbohydrate to fluids, and vice versa, does not prevent adequate supplementation of each, especially if large volumes are consumed to keep the stomach somewhat full and thus increase gastric emptying. Therefore, in most situations there are no trade-offs between fluid and carbohydrate. However, the scientific literature contains surprisingly little direct data regarding the extent to which fluid replacement during exercise should match sweat rate to offset cardiovascular drift and hyperthermia when sweat rate approaches or exceeds 1 l·h-1 and hyperthermia is common. Therefore, it is not possible at this time to develop scientifically sound recommendations regarding the optimal fluid replacement regimen, which may vary from person to person because of the tremendous interindividual variability in gastric emptying rate. It remains to be determined whether the benefits of high rates of fluid ingestion during continuous exercise (i.e.; 600–1,200 ml·h-1) outweigh the interruption of exercise and the discomfort it may cause.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1249/00005768-199206000-00009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
COYLE, E. F., & MONTAIN, S. J.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Venue
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
1992-06
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
671???678
ISSN
0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4294414689
Cited by
47
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
carbohydrate intake, fluid intake, prolonged exercise, dehydration, hyperthermia, sweat rate, gastric emptying, carbohydrate-electrolyte solution, fatigue, blood glucose, cardiovascular drift, sports nutrition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review