Cited by 113Muscle metabolism and nutritionThermoregulation and physiological responsesCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Multiple transportable carbohydrates enhance gastric emptying and fluid delivery

Jeukendrup, A. E., Moseley, L.·2010·Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports

Abstract

This study compared the effects of ingesting water (WATER), an 8.6% glucose solution (GLU) and an 8.6% glucose+fructose solution (2:1 ratio, GLU+FRU) on gastric emptying (GE), fluid delivery, and markers of hydration status during moderate intensity exercise. Eight male subjects (age=24 ± 2 years, weight=74.5 ± 1.2 kg, VO 2max=62.6 ± 2.5 mL/kg/min) performed three 120 min cycling bouts at 61% VO 2max). Subjects ingested GLU, GLU+FRU (both delivering 1.5 g/min carbohydrate), or WATER throughout exercise, ingesting 2.1 L. Serial dye dilution measurements of GE were made throughout exercise and subjects ingested 5.00 g of D 2 O and 150 mg of 13 C‐acetate at 60 min to obtain measures of fluid uptake and GE, respectively. GLU+FRU resulted in faster rates of deuterium accumulation, an earlier time to peak in the 13 C enrichment of expired air and a faster rate of GE compared with GLU. GLU+FRU also attenuated the rise in heart rate that occurred in GLU and WATER and resulted in lower ratings of perceived exertion. There was a greater loss in body weight with GLU corrected for fluid intake. These data suggest that ingestion of a combined GLU+FRU solution increases GE and “fluid delivery” compared with a glucose only solution.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2008.00862.x

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Intestinal absorption is the main barrier to delivering carbohydrate to the contracting muscle.

    “It is also known that intestinal absorption is the main barrier to delivering carbohydrate to the contracting muscle [69].”

    From Periodized Nutrition for Athletes (2017) · cites this paper as [69]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jeukendrup, A. E., & Moseley, L.
Affiliations
University of Birmingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Jeukendrup, A. E.
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-01-19
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
112-121
ISSN
  • 0905-7188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0838
OpenAlex
W1994181664
Cited by
113
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
GlaxoSmithKline
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
gastric emptying, fluid delivery, glucose, fructose, carbohydrate intake, hydration status, physical activity, moderate-intensity cycling, deuterium dilution, 13C-acetate, heart rate, perceived exertion, weight loss
MeSH terms
Sodium Citrate, Adult, Beverages, Breath Tests, Citrates, Exercise Test, Fructose, Gastric Emptying, Glucose, Humans, Lactates, Male, Oxygen Consumption, Physical Endurance, Water, Weight Loss, Exercise, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review