Cited by 23Muscle metabolism and nutritionSports Performance and TrainingCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Effects of Preexercise Carbohydrate Ingestion on Mountain Bike Performance

CRAMP, TANYA, BROAD, ELIZABETH, MARTIN, DAVID, MEYER, BARBARA J.·2004·Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study examined the performance and metabolic effects of consuming 1.0 (LC) and 3.0 (HC) grams of carbohydrate (CHO) per kilogram body mass (BM), 3 h before a 93-min simulated mountain bike race. METHODS: After two familiarization trials, eight male subjects undertook two CHO trials in a double-blind counterbalanced fashion on a cycle ergometer. The HC meal was supplemented with maltodextrin while maintaining the same glycemic index and apparent volume of food as the LC meal. Stochastic cycling was undertaken for 93 min (4 x 22.50-min laps) with performance measured as the total work performed in 6 x 30-s periods each lap during the test. RESULTS: Performance in lap 1 was better with LC (P < 0.03) whereas performance in lap 4 was better with HC (P < 0.02). Overall performance was 3% greater in HC compared with LC (NS, P = 0.13). Serum glucose was significantly lower (P < 0.04) in HC immediately before the mountain bike test (180 min postprandial) and at 10 min into the test (P < 0.01). Gastrointestinal comfort decreased similarly for both trials over time (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that ingestion of 3.0 g x kg(-1) BM of CHO 3 h before a 93-min mountain bike simulated race does not produce a statistically significant improvement in overall performance compared with 1.0 g x kg(-1) BM. However, in real terms, a 3% performance improvement may benefit athletes in a race situation. Differences in performance during the first and last laps indicate a variation in pacing strategies that may have resulted from differing blood glucose levels between trials.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1249/01.mss.0000139805.91675.5b

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Endurance athletes are well known to follow diets that result in the consumption of high amounts of both simple and complex carbohydrates.

    “Endurance athletes are well known to follow diets that result in the consumption of high amounts of both simple and complex carbohydrates [208, 209].”

    From The athletic gut microbiota (2020) · cites this paper as [208]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
CRAMP, T., BROAD, E., MARTIN, D., & MEYER, B. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Wollongong (AU)
  • ACT Government (AU)
Venue
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2004-09
Volume
36
Issue
9
Pages
1602-1609
ISSN
0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2077726420
Cited by
23
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2014: 2
FWCI
0.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
carbohydrate loading, maltodextrin, serum glucose, pacing strategy, endurance cycling
MeSH terms
Adult, Australia, Bicycling, Blood Glucose, Dietary Carbohydrates, Drinking Behavior, Physical Exertion, Fatty Acids, Nonesterified, Humans, Male, Oxygen Consumption, Respiration, Task Performance and Analysis, Gastrointestinal Tract

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review