Cited by 2Sports Performance and TrainingCardiovascular and exercise physiologyPhysical Education and Training Studies

Increase In Body Mass Do Not Negatively Affect Aerobic Capacity In Elite Male Soccer Players: 67

Ayotte, Béatrice, Carey, Vincent, Charron, Jérémie, Ibo, Justin, Ferland, Pierre-Marc, Comtois, Alain Steve·2021·Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

Abstract

Previous research has shown that an increase in body mass is unfoundedly linked to a decrease of aerobic capacity. The focal point of this decrease is a reduction in the maximal rate of oxygen utilization (VO2 max). PURPOSE: To measure the effect of a Resistance Training (RT) program and its expected gain in lean mass on aerobic capacity in soccer players. The hypothesis being that a gain in body mass obtained from resistance training (RT) will not be detrimental to aerobic capacity. METHODS: Eleven male soccer players from a U-19 team of the Elite Ivory Coast Training Academy (age:15.73 ± 1.21 years) took part in a 12-week, three times per week, RT program, while maintaining their regular soccer training program. The RT program included three different full-body workouts, with percentage of maximum repetition (RM) ranging from 75% to 87% of 1 RM. Participants bodyweight (BW) was recorded and bodyfat percentage (BF%) was measured using an Harpenden caliper and the Durin & Ramahan 4-site skinfold method. Participant VO2 max was extrapolated from the Carzola VAMÉVAL test. Differences between pre and post measures were calculated with a paired samples T-test. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 27. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 RESULTS: Results show a significant (p < 0.05) improvement of VO2max with base values starting at 58.84 ± 1.77 mL/kg/min and increasing to 60.07 ± 2.18 mL/kg/min after 12 weeks of RT even though mean BW significantly increased from 61.74 ± 4.66 kg to 62.55 ± 4.83 kg. Furthermore, mean lean body mass (LBM) increased significantly from 55.73 ± 4.21 kg to 57.62 ± 4.29 kg while BF% significantly decreased from 9.54 ± 1.13% to 7.66 ± 0.58 %. CONCLUSION: Results show that a RT protocol does not negatively impact aerobic capacity but rather potentially increases it. 12 weeks of RT and the increase in BW and LBM that resulted from it did not negatively affect aerobic capacity. However, further research should include a control group, to confirm without a doubt that an RT protocol can, in fact, improve VO2 max.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1249/01.mss.0000759280.17981.c7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ayotte, B., Carey, V., Charron, J., Ibo, J., Ferland, P.-M., & Comtois, A. S.
Venue
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2021-08
Volume
53
Issue
8S
Pages
21-21
ISSN
  • 0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-0315
OpenAlex
W3181898474
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 2
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Training Studies
Keywords
resistance training, cardiorespiratory fitness, VO2max, weight gain, lean body mass, body fat percentage, soccer players, youth athletes, elite football, training load, skinfold thickness, body composition, endurance performance, exercise frequency, exercise intensity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review