Cited by 49Sports Performance and TrainingCardiovascular and exercise physiologyPhysical Activity and Health

Periodization Strategies in Older Adults: Impact on Physical Function and Health

Open access
CONLON, JENNY A., NEWTON, ROBERT U., TUFANO, JAMES J., BANYARD, HARRY G., HOPPER, AMANDA J., RIDGE, ASHLEY J., HAFF, G. GREGORY·2016·Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study compared the effect of periodized versus nonperiodized (NP) resistance training (RT) on physical function and health outcomes in older adults. METHODS: Forty-one apparently healthy untrained older adults (women = 21, men = 20; 70.9 ± 5.1 yr; 166.3 ± 8.2 cm; 72.9 ± 13.4 kg) were recruited and randomly stratified to a NP, block periodized, or daily undulating periodized training group. Outcome measures were assessed at baseline and after a 22-wk × 3 d·wk RT intervention, including; anthropometrics, body composition, blood pressure and biomarkers, maximal strength, functional capacity, balance confidence, and quality of life. RESULTS: Thirty-three subjects satisfied all study requirements and were included in analyses (women = 17, men = 16; 71.3 ± 5.4 yr; 166.3 ± 8.5 cm; 72.5 ± 13.7 kg). The main finding was that all three RT models produced significant improvements in several physical function and physiological health outcomes, including; systolic blood pressure, blood biomarkers, body composition, maximal strength, functional capacity and balance confidence, with no between-group differences. CONCLUSIONS: Periodized RT, specifically block periodization and daily undulating periodized, and NP RT are equally effective for promoting significant improvements in physical function and health outcomes among apparently healthy untrained older adults. Therefore, periodization strategies do not appear to be necessary during the initial stages of RT in this population. Practitioners should work toward increasing RT participation in the age via feasible and efficacious interventions targeting long-term adherence in minimally supervised settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1249/mss.0000000000001053

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Periodized resistance training in older adults had equal efficacy for physical function and physiological outcomes compared with non-periodized resistance training.

    “Periodized resistance training in older adults demonstrated equal efficacy in physical function and physiological outcomes when compared with non-periodized resistance training360.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [3]3. Baker D, Wilson G, Carlyon R. Periodization: the effect on strength of manipulating volume and intensity. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 1994;8(4):235.
  2. [11]11. Fleck SJ. Periodized Strength Training: A Critical Review. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 1999;13(1):82-9.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
CONLON, J. A., NEWTON, R. U., TUFANO, J. J., BANYARD, H. G., HOPPER, A. J., RIDGE, A. J., & HAFF, G. G.
Affiliations
Edith Cowan University (AU)
Venue
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2016-12
Volume
48
Issue
12
Pages
2426-2436
ISSN
0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2477430807
Cited by
49
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6
FWCI
7.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Australasian Journal of Paramedicine (submittedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Edith Cowan University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
resistance training, periodization, older adults, block periodization, undulating periodization, physical function, maximal strength, functional capacity, balance confidence, blood pressure, body composition, quality of life, training adherence
MeSH terms
Aged, Blood Pressure, Body Composition, Diet, Postural Balance, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Physical Fitness, Quality of Life, Time Factors, Biomarkers, Exercise, Muscle Strength, Resistance Training, Sarcopenia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review