Cited by 137Sports Performance and TrainingCardiovascular and exercise physiologyMuscle metabolism and nutrition

Practicing the Test Produces Strength Equivalent to Higher Volume Training

MATTOCKS, KEVIN T., BUCKNER, SAMUEL L., JESSEE, MATTHEW B., DANKEL, SCOTT J., MOUSER, J. GRANT, LOENNEKE, JEREMY P.·2017·Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

Abstract

Purpose To determine if muscle growth is important for increasing muscle strength or if changes in strength can be entirely explained from practicing the strength test. Methods Thirty-eight untrained individuals performed knee extension and chest press exercise for 8 wk. Individuals were randomly assigned to either a high-volume training group (HYPER) or a group just performing the one repetition maximum (1RM) strength test (TEST). The HYPER group performed four sets to volitional failure (~8RM-12RM), whereas the TEST group performed up to five attempts to lift as much weight as possible one time each visit. Results Data are presented as mean (90% confidence interval). The change in muscle size was greater in the HYPER group for both the upper and lower bodies at most but not all sites. The change in 1RM strength for both the upper body (difference of -1.1 [-4.8, 2.4] kg) and lower body (difference of 1.0 [-0.7, 2.8] kg for dominant leg) was not different between groups (similar for nondominant). Changes in isometric and isokinetic torque were not different between groups. The HYPER group observed a greater change in muscular endurance (difference of 2 [1,4] repetitions) only in the dominant leg. There were no differences in the change between groups in upper body endurance. There were between-group differences for exercise volume (mean [95% confidence interval]) of the dominant (difference of 11,049.3 [9254.6-12,844.0] kg) leg (similar for nondominant) and chest press with t…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1249/mss.0000000000001300

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MATTOCKS, K. T., BUCKNER, S. L., JESSEE, M. B., DANKEL, S. J., MOUSER, J. G., & LOENNEKE, J. P.
Affiliations
University of Mississippi (US)
Venue
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2017-09
Volume
49
Issue
9
Pages
1945-1954
ISSN
0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2611460763
Cited by
137
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 7
FWCI
18.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Keywords
resistance training, one-repetition maximum, high-volume training, muscle hypertrophy, muscle strength gain, knee extension, chest press, muscular endurance, isokinetic torque, isometric torque, exercise volume, untrained individuals
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Adolescent, Adult, Electromyography, Exercise Test, Female, Humans, Male, Physical Endurance, Weight Lifting, Muscle, Skeletal, Muscle Strength, Young Adult, Physical Conditioning, Human

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review