Cited by 14Cardiovascular and exercise physiologySports Performance and TrainingMuscle metabolism and nutrition

Fat Oxidation Rates in Professional Soccer Players

RANDELL, REBECCA K., CARTER, JAMES M., JEUKENDRUP, ASKER E., LIZARRAGA, MARIA ANTONIA, YANGUAS, JAVIER I., ROLLO, IAN·2019·Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

Abstract

Purpose Large interindividual variation exists in maximal fat oxidation (MFO) rates and the exercise intensity at which it occurs (FATMAX). However, there are no data describing the shape of the fat oxidation curve or if individual differences exist when tested on separate occasions. Furthermore, there are limited data on fat metabolism in professional team sport athletes. Therefore, the aim of this study was to test-retest the concavity (shape) and intercept (height) of fat oxidation curves within a group of professional soccer players. Method On two occasions, 16 professional male soccer players completed a graded exercise test in a fasted state (≥5 h). Rates of fat oxidation were determined using indirect calorimetry. Maximal oxygen uptake (V˙O2max) was measured to calculate FATMAX (%V˙O2max). The shape of the fat oxidation curves were modeled on an individual basis using third-degree polynomial. Test-by-test differences, in the shape and vertical shift of the fat oxidation curves, were established to assess within-individual variability. Results Average absolute MFO was 0.69 ± 0.15 g·min (range, 0.45-0.99 g·min). On a group level, no significant differences were found in MFO between the two tests. No differences were found (P > 0.05) in the shape of the fat oxidation curves in 13 of 16 players (test 1 vs test 2). There were also no differences (P > 0.05) in the vertical shift of the fat oxidation curves in 10 players. Conclusions In general, the shape of the fat oxidation…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1249/mss.0000000000001973

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
RANDELL, R. K., CARTER, J. M., JEUKENDRUP, A. E., LIZARRAGA, M. A., YANGUAS, J. I., & ROLLO, I.
Affiliations
  • PepsiCo (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Loughborough University (GB)
  • FC Barcelona (ES)
Venue
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2019-03-06
Volume
51
Issue
8
Pages
1677-1683
ISSN
  • 0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-0315
OpenAlex
W2920972969
Cited by
14
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Keywords
fat oxidation, maximal fat oxidation, Fatmax, test-retest reliability, within-person variability, professional football players, team sport athletes, fat metabolism, training status, body composition, personalized nutrition
MeSH terms
Adult, Body Composition, Calorimetry, Indirect, Dietary Fats, Exercise Test, Humans, Male, Oxidation-Reduction, Oxygen Consumption, Soccer, Young Adult, Physical Conditioning, Human

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review