Cited by 29Physical Activity and HealthObesity, Physical Activity, DietCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Greater Weight Loss from Running than Walking during a 6.2-Yr Prospective Follow-Up

Open access
WILLIAMS, PAUL T.·2013·Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to test whether equivalent changes in moderate (walking) and vigorous exercise (running) produce equivalent weight loss under free-living, nonexperimental conditions. METHODS: Regression analyses of changes (Δ) in body mass index (BMI) versus exercise energy expenditure (ΔMET-hours per day, 1 MET = 3.5 mL O2·kg·min) from survey questionnaires completed at baseline and 6.2 yr thereafter in 15,237 walkers and 32,216 runners were used in this study. RESULTS: At baseline, walkers spent less energy walking than runners spent running (mean ± SD; males = 2.22 ± 1.65 vs 5.31 ± 3.12 MET·h·d, females = 2.15 ± 1.63 vs 4.76 ± 3.03 MET·h·d), and walkers were significantly heavier than runners (males = 26.63 ± 4.04 vs 24.09 ± 2.58 kg·m, females = 25.44 ± 5.14 vs 21.61 ± 2.49 kg·m). During follow-up, energy expenditure declined less for walking in walkers than for running in runners (males = -0.19 ± 1.92 vs -1.27 ± 2.87 MET·h·d, females = -0.30 ± 1.93 vs -1.28 ± 2.85 MET·h·d). ΔBMI was inversely related to both ΔMET-hours per day run and ΔMET-hours per day walked, but more strongly to ΔMET-hours per day run than walked in men and in heavier women. Specifically, the regression coefficient for ΔBMI versus ΔMET-hours per day was significantly more negative for running than walking in men in the first quartile (differences in slope ± SE: -0.06 ± 0.03, P = 0.01), second quartile (-0.10 ± 0.03, P = 0.001), third quartile (-0.17 ± 0.03, P < 10), and fourth quartile of BMI (-0.14 ± 0.03, P < 10) and in the fourth BMI quartile of women (-0.32 ± 0.04 kg·m per MET-hours per day, P < 10). This represented 90% greater weight loss per MET-hours per day run than walked in the fourth BMI quartile for both sexes. Age-related weight gain was attenuated by running in both sexes (P < 10) and by walking in women (P = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Although ΔBMI was significantly associated with both ΔMET-hours per day run and walked, the ΔBMI was significantly greater for Δrunning than Δwalking.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1249/mss.0b013e31827b0d0a

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A prospective study with 47,453 participants demonstrated greater weight loss from running than walking the same distance daily.

    “a prospective study with 47,453 participants demonstrated greater weight loss from running than walking the same distance daily [16].”

    From A Comparison of Leg Muscle Oxygenation, Cardiorespiratory Responses, and Blood Lactate between Walking and Running at the Same Speed (2024) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Abstract Methods report 15,237 walkers and 32,216 runners, totaling 47,453, surveyed 6.2 years apart. The Abstract Results find a stronger association between changes in running and BMI than between changes in walking and BMI in men and heavier women. The comparison is per change in energy expenditure, not between people running and walking the same distance daily; the observational study also does not establish that running caused greater weight loss. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [27]Summerbell CD Douthwaite W Whittaker V The association between diet and physical activity and subsequent excess weight gain and obesity assessed at 5 years of age or older: a systematic review of the epidemiological evidence Int J Obes (Lond) 2009 33 Suppl 3 S1 92 19597430

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
WILLIAMS, P. T.
Affiliations
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
WILLIAMS, PAUL T.
Venue
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2013-04
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
706-713
ISSN
0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2084146983
Cited by
29
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3
FWCI
1.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL094717, R01HL094717)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
running, walking, weight loss, body mass index, exercise energy expenditure, free-living physical activity, sex differences, obesity, energy balance, weight loss maintenance, weight regain, body fat percentage, total body water, bone mineral density, bone mineral area, bone mineral volume
MeSH terms
Adult, Energy Metabolism, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Obesity, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Running, Weight Loss, Body Mass Index, Walking, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review