The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Boston Public School Match
Open accessAbstract
After the publication of “School Choice: A Mechanism Design Approach” by Abdulkadiroglu and Sonmez (2003), a Boston Globe reporter contacted us about the Boston Public Schools (BPS) system for assigning students to schools. The Globe article highlighted the difficulties that Boston’s system may give parents in strategizing about applying to schools. Briefly, Boston tries to give students their firstchoice school. But a student who fails to get her first choice may find her later choices filled by students who chose them first. So there is a risk in ranking a school first if there is a chance of not being admitted; other schools that would have been possible had they been listed first may also be filled. Valerie Edwards, then Strategic Planning Manager at BPS, and her colleague Carleton Jones invited us to a meeting in October 2003. BPS agreed to a study of their assignment system and provided us with micro-level data sets on choices and characteristics of students in the grades at which school choices are made (K, 1, 6, and 9), and school characteristics. Based on the pending results of this study, the Superintendent has asked for our advice on the design of a new assignment mechanism. This paper describes some of the difficulties with the current mechanism and some elements of the design and evaluation of possible replacement mechanisms. School choice in Boston has been partly shaped by desegregation. In 1974, Judge W. Arthur Garrity ordered busing for racial balance. In 1987, the U.S. Court of Appeals freed BPS to adopt a new, choice-based assignment plan. In 1999 BPS eliminated racial preferences in assignment and adopted the current mechanism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
College Admissions and the Stability of Marriage
Gale, D., & Shapley, L. S. (1962) · The American Mathematical Monthly · doi:10.1080/00029890.1962.11989827 · Cited by 5,985
Myles, G. D. (1993) · European Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1016/0176-2680(93)90012-j · Cited by 875
Cited by
Repugnance as a Constraint on Markets
Roth, A. E. (2007) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.21.3.37 · Cited by 560
Self-citationWhat Parents Want: School Preferences and School Choice
Burgess, S., Greaves, E., Vignoles, A., & Wilson, D. (2015) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/ecoj.12153 · Cited by 377
Pathak, P. A., & Sönmez, T. (2013) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.103.1.80 · Cited by 312
Self-citationEffective affirmative action in school choice
Hafalir, I. E., Yenmez, M. B., & Yildirim, M. A. (2013) · Theoretical Economics · doi:10.3982/te1135 · Cited by 278
Haeringer, G., & Klijn, F. (2009) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1016/j.jet.2009.05.002 · Cited by 276
Metadata
- Authors
- Abdulkadiroğlu, A., Pathak, P. A., Roth, A. E., & Sönmez, T.
- Venue
- American Economic Review
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2005-04-01
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 368-371
- ISSN
- 0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2128340555
- Cited by
- 530
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 37.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Boston Public School Match. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1257/000282805774669637
- The paper
- Abdulkadiroğlu, A., Pathak, P. A., Roth, A. E., & Sönmez, T. (2005). The Boston Public School Match. American Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282805774669637
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.