The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Liquidity versus Wealth in Household Debt Obligations: Evidence from Housing Policy in the Great Recession
Abstract
We exploit variation in mortgage modifications to disentangle the impact of reducing long-term obligations with no change in short-term payments (“wealth”), and reducing short-term payments with no change in long-term obligations (“liquidity”). Using regression discontinuity and difference-in-differences research designs with administrative data measuring default and consumption, we find that principal reductions that increase wealth without affecting liquidity have no effect, while maturity extensions that increase only liquidity have large effects. This suggests that liquidity drives default and consumption decisions for borrowers in our sample and that distressed debt restructurings can be redesigned with substantial gains to borrowers, lenders, and taxpayers. (JEL E21, G21, G51, R38)
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting
Laibson, D. (1997) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355397555253 · Cited by 6,122
Research works printed but not linked: 39
- 10.1093/rfs/hhw018 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.07.005 · DOI
- 10.1086/691701 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1162/REST_a_00606 · DOI
- 10.1257/aer.20150491 · DOI
- 10.1093/restud/rdx060 · DOI
- 10.1111/jofi.12523 · DOI
- 10.1257/aer.103.1.220 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2005.10.016 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1538-4616.2010.00365.x · DOI
- 10.1257/aer.20180086 · DOI
- 10.1111/jofi.12602 · DOI
- 10.1257/aer.20141313 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1353/eca.2014.0013 · DOI
- 10.1093/qje/qjs023 · DOI
- Ehrlich Gabriel, 2015, Congressional Budget Of ce Working Paper, 2015
- 10.1257/pol.20150007 · DOI
- 10.1093/rfs/hhx115 · DOI
- Greenwald Daniel, 2018, MIT Sloan Research Paper, 5261
- 10.1093/qje/qjx005 · DOI
- 10.1111/1468-0262.00183 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/jmcb.12317 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-6229.2012.00351.x · DOI
- 10.1257/aer.20140989 · DOI
- 10.1093/restud/rdr043 · DOI
- 10.1257/aer.96.5.1589 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.red.2014.10.003 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.01.008 · DOI
- 10.1257/jel.48.2.281 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1257/aer.100.3.1080 · DOI
- 10.1093/qje/qjt020 · DOI
- 10.1257/aer.101.5.2132 · DOI
- 10.1111/jofi.12719 · DOI
- 10.1257/pol.2.2.185 · DOI
- 10.1093/rfs/hhq031 · DOI
- 10.1093/rfs/hhw034 · DOI
- 10.1162/0033553053970197 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jue.2016.03.007 · DOI
- 10.1086/261605 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dinerstein, M., Earnest, S., Koustas, D., & Yannelis, C. (2025) · NBER Working Paper Series · doi:10.3386/w33462 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Ganong, P., & Noel, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Chicago (US)
- ORCID
- Ganong, Peter
- Venue
- American Economic Review
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2020-10-01
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3100-3138
- ISSN
- 0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2889419114
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 13
- FWCI
- 20.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Economic Review (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Housing Market and Economics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
- Keywords
- household debt, mortgage modification, liquidity, household wealth, mortgage default, debt restructuring, housing policy, Great Recession, household consumption
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review