Cited by 519Nonprofit Sector and VolunteeringExperimental Behavioral Economics StudiesBlood donation and transfusion practices

Does Price Matter in Charitable Giving? Evidence from a Large-Scale Natural Field Experiment

Karlan, Dean, List, John A·2007·American Economic Review

Abstract

We conducted a natural field experiment to further our understanding of the economics of charity. Using direct mail solicitations to over 50,000 prior donors of a nonprofit organization, we tested the effectiveness of a matching grant on charitable giving. We find that the match offer increases both the revenue per solicitation and the response rate. Larger match ratios (i.e., $3:$1 and $2:$1) relative to a smaller match ratio ($1:$1) had no additional impact, however. The results provide avenues for future empirical and theoretical work on charitable giving, cost-benefit analysis, and the private provision of public goods. (JEL D64, L31)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/aer.97.5.1774

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karlan, D., & List, J. A.
Affiliations
Innovations for Poverty Action (US)
Venue
American Economic Review
Published
2007-12-01
Volume
97
Issue
5
Pages
1774-1793
ISSN
0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3121571727
Cited by
519
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 17
FWCI
78.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Economic Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Blood donation and transfusion practices
Keywords
charitable giving, matching grants, direct mail solicitation, nonprofit organizations, private provision of public goods, cost-benefit analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review