Cited by 121Social Media and PoliticsSocial Capital and NetworksMedia and Digital Communication

The Structure of Online Activism

Open access
Lewis, Kevin, Gray, Kurt, Meierhenrich, Jens·2014·Sociological Science

Abstract

Despite the tremendous amount of attention that has been paid to the internet as a tool for civic engagement, we still have little idea how "active" is the average online activist or how social networks matter in facilitating electronic protest.In this paper, we use complete records on the donation and recruitment activity of 1.2 million members of the Save Darfur "Cause" on Facebook to provide a detailed first look at a massive online social movement.While both donation and recruitment behavior are socially patterned, the vast majority of Cause members recruited no one else into the Cause and contributed no money to it-suggesting that in the case of the Save Darfur campaign, Facebook conjured an illusion of activism rather than facilitating the real thing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15195/v1.a1

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social media in general, and Twitter in particular, have enormous capacity to elevate and sustain counterpublic voices and refocus the attention of the mainstream public sphere.

    “While much of so-called 'activism' online is quite inactive in terms of sustained social change, recent work illustrates the enormous capacity for social media in general, and Twitter in particular, to elevate and sustain counterpublic voices and refocus the attention of the mainstream public sphere (Hamdy & Gomaa, 2012;Lewis, Gray, & Meierhenrich, 2014;Papacharissi & de Fatima Oliveira, 2012).”

    From #Ferguson is everywhere: initiators in emerging counterpublic networks (2016) · cites this paper as Lewis, Gray, & Meierhenrich, 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lewis, K., Gray, K., & Meierhenrich, J.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Venue
Sociological Science
Published
2014
Pages
1-9
ISSN
2330-6696 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2244645465
Cited by
121
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 1
FWCI
47.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Sociological Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
digital activism, social movements, Facebook, online recruitment, online donation, citizen participation, social networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review