Cited by 178Experimental Behavioral Economics StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsPsychology of Social Influence

Promoting cooperation in the field

Kraft-Todd, Gordon, Yoeli, Erez, Bhanot, Syon, Rand, David·2015·Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.02.006

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interventions based on observability and descriptive norms are highly effective at increasing cooperative behaviour in economic games as well as in the field.

    “Accordingly, interventions based on observability and descriptive norms are highly effective at increasing cooperative behaviour in economic games as well as in the field 192 .”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kraft-Todd, G., Yoeli, E., Bhanot, S., & Rand, D.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Rand, David
Venue
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-06
Volume
3
Pages
96-101
ISSN
2352-1546 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2068824522
Cited by
178
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
8.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences (publishedVersion)
Funders
John Templeton Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychology of Social Influence
Keywords
cooperation, field experiments, social intervention, descriptive norms, observability, reciprocity, reputation, material rewards, charitable giving, voting behavior, conservation, policy interventions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review